Remove the misbehaving function and call
Repository.GetFilesChangedBetween instead.
Fixes#23919
---
~~_TODO_ test this~~ `Repository.getFilesChanged` seems to be only used
by Gitea Actions, but a similar function already exists
**Update** I tested this change and the issue is gone.
The _graceful_ should fail less when the `.editorconfig` file isn't
properly written, e.g. boolean values from YAML or unparseable numbers
(when a number is expected). As is... information is lost as the
_warning_ (a go-multierror.Error) is ignored. If anybody knows how to
send them to the UI as warning; any help is appreciated.
Closes#20694
Signed-off-by: Yoan Blanc <yoan@dosimple.ch>
At first, we have one unified team unit permission which is called
`Team.Authorize` in DB.
But since https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/17811, we allowed
different units to have different permission.
The old code is only designed for the old version. So after #17811, if
org users have write permission of other units, but have no permission
of packages, they can also get write permission of packages.
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Follow #23633 and #23240Close#23814
Now we almost have a complete test set for Gitea's LocalStore.
This PR is still a quick fix for the legacy locale system (see the
TODOs), to resolve the problems fundamentally, it needs more work in the
future.
Follow #21962
After I eat my own dogfood, I would say that
ONLY_SHOW_RELEVANT_REPOS=false is necessary for many private/enterprise
instances, because many private repositories do not have
"description/topic", users just want to search by their names.
This PR also adds `PageIsExploreRepositories` check, to make code more
strict, because the `search` template is shared for different purpose.
And during the test, I found a bug that the "Search" button didn't
respect the "relevant" parameter, so this PR fixes the bug by the way
together.
I think this PR needs to be backported.
# Why this PR comes
At first, I'd like to help users like #23636 (there are a lot)
The unclear "Internal Server Error" is quite anonying, scare users,
frustrate contributors, nobody knows what happens.
So, it's always good to provide meaningful messages to end users (of
course, do not leak sensitive information).
When I started working on the "response message to end users", I found
that the related code has a lot of technical debt. A lot of copy&paste
code, unclear fields and usages.
So I think it's good to make everything clear.
# Tech Backgrounds
Gitea has many sub-commands, some are used by admins, some are used by
SSH servers or Git Hooks. Many sub-commands use "internal API" to
communicate with Gitea web server.
Before, Gitea server always use `StatusCode + Json "err" field` to
return messages.
* The CLI sub-commands: they expect to show all error related messages
to site admin
* The Serv/Hook sub-commands (for git clients): they could only show
safe messages to end users, the error log could only be recorded by
"SSHLog" to Gitea web server.
In the old design, it assumes that:
* If the StatusCode is 500 (in some functions), then the "err" field is
error log, shouldn't be exposed to git client.
* If the StatusCode is 40x, then the "err" field could be exposed. And
some functions always read the "err" no matter what the StatusCode is.
The old code is not strict, and it's difficult to distinguish the
messages clearly and then output them correctly.
# This PR
To help to remove duplicate code and make everything clear, this PR
introduces `ResponseExtra` and `requestJSONResp`.
* `ResponseExtra` is a struct which contains "extra" information of a
internal API response, including StatusCode, UserMsg, Error
* `requestJSONResp` is a generic function which can be used for all
cases to help to simplify the calls.
* Remove all `map["err"]`, always use `private.Response{Err}` to
construct error messages.
* User messages and error messages are separated clearly, the `fail` and
`handleCliResponseExtra` will output correct messages.
* Replace all `Internal Server Error` messages with meaningful (still
safe) messages.
This PR saves more than 300 lines, while makes the git client messages
more clear.
Many gitea-serv/git-hook related essential functions are covered by
tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Closes#20955
This PR adds the possibility to disable blank Issues, when the Repo has
templates. This can be done by creating the file
`.gitea/issue_config.yaml` with the content `blank_issues_enabled` in
the Repo.
Adds API endpoints to manage issue/PR dependencies
* `GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/blocks` List issues that are
blocked by this issue
* `POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/blocks` Block the issue
given in the body by the issue in path
* `DELETE /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/blocks` Unblock the issue
given in the body by the issue in path
* `GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` List an
issue's dependencies
* `POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` Create a new
issue dependencies
* `DELETE /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` Remove an
issue dependency
Closes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/15393Closes#22115
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Reference:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22578#issuecomment-1444180053
Credits to @tdesveaux , thank you very much for catching the problem. If
you'd like to open a PR, feel free to replace this one.
Git reports fatal errors for ambiguous arguments:
```
fatal: ambiguous argument 'refs/a...refs/b': unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
Use '--' to separate paths from revisions, like this:
'git <command> [<revision>...] -- [<file>...]'
```
So the `--` separator is necessary in some cases.
Follow:
* #23574
* Remove all ".tooltip[data-content=...]"
Major changes:
* Remove "tooltip" class, use "[data-tooltip-content=...]" instead of
".tooltip[data-content=...]"
* Remove legacy `data-position`, it's dead code since last Fomantic
Tooltip -> Tippy Tooltip refactoring
* Rename reaction attribute from `data-content` to
`data-reaction-content`
* Add comments for some `data-content`: `{{/* used by the form */}}`
* Remove empty "ui" class
* Use "text color" for SVG icons (a few)
Remove `[repository.editor] PREVIEWABLE_FILE_MODES` setting that seemed
like it was intended to support this but did not work. Instead, whenever
viewing a file shows a preview, also have a Preview tab in the file
editor.
Add new `/markup` web and API endpoints with `comment`, `gfm`,
`markdown` and new `file` mode that uses a file path to determine the
renderer.
Remove `/markdown` web endpoint but keep the API for backwards and
GitHub compatibility.
## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️
The `[repository.editor] PREVIEWABLE_FILE_MODES` setting was removed.
This setting served no practical purpose and was not working correctly.
Instead a preview tab is always shown in the file editor when supported.
---------
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Close#23622
As described in the issue, disabling the LFS/Package settings will cause
errors when running `gitea dump` or `gitea doctor`. We need to check the
settings and the related operations should be skipped if the settings
are disabled.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Follow #23037
Fix [#22598
comment](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22958#issuecomment-1475763042)
Workflows with `pull_request` trigger event can't be triggered by
`pull_request_sync` event. This PR adds the `canGithubEventMatch`
function to check if a Github event can match any Gitea event. If the
Github event matches a Gitea event, the related workflows should be
triggered.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Since #23493 has conflicts with latest commits, this PR is my proposal
for fixing #23371
Details are in the comments
And refactor the `modules/options` module, to make it always use
"filepath" to access local files.
Benefits:
* No need to do `util.CleanPath(strings.ReplaceAll(p, "\\", "/"))),
"/")` any more (not only one before)
* The function behaviors are clearly defined
There are multiple duplicate reports of errors during template rendering
due to broken custom templates.
Unfortunately the error returned here is somewhat difficult for users to
understand and it doesn't return the context of the error.
This PR attempts to parse the error returned by the template renderer to
add in some further context including the filename of the template AND
the preceding lines within that template file.
Ref #23274
---------
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Close#23444
Add `Repository` to npm package `Metadata` struct so the `repository` in
`package.json` can be stored and be returned in the endpoint.
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
This PR fixes the tags sort issue mentioned in #23432
The tags on dropdown shoud be sorted in descending order of time but are
not. Because when getting tags, it execeutes `git tag sort
--sort=-taggerdate`. Git supports two types of tags: lightweight and
annotated, and `git tag sort --sort=-taggerdate` dosen't work with
lightweight tags, which will not give correct result. This PR add
`GetTagNamesByRepoID ` to get tags from the database so the tags are
sorted.
Also adapt this change to the droplist when comparing branches.
Dropdown places:
<img width="369" alt="截屏2023-03-15 14 25 39"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17645053/225224506-65a72e50-4c11-41d7-8187-a7e9c7dab2cb.png">
<img width="675" alt="截屏2023-03-15 14 25 27"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17645053/225224526-65ce8008-340c-43f6-aa65-b6bd9e1a1bf1.png">
Currently gitea shows no commit information for files starting with a
colon.
[I set up a minimal repro repository that reproduces this error once
it's migrated on gitea](https://github.com/kbolashev/colon-test)
<img width="1209" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/111061261/219326625-0e6d3a86-8b58-4d67-bc24-8a78963f36b9.png">
This is happening because the filenames piped to the `git log` command
are written as is, and it doesn't work when you have a colon at the
start of the filename, and you need to escape it.
You can test it locally, if you do
```
mkdir repo
git init
touch :file
git add . && git commit -m "Add file with colon"
git log -- :file
```
git log returns nothing. However, if you do `git log -- "\:file"`, it
will show the commit with the file change.
This PR escapes the starting colons in paths in the `LogNameStatusRepo`
function, making gitea return commit info about the file with the bad
filename.
<img width="1209" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/111061261/219328299-46451246-4006-45e3-89b1-c244635ded23.png">
This error shows up only with files starting with colon, anywhere else
in filename is ok. Dashes at the beginning also seem to be working.
I don't know gitea internals well enough to know where else this error
can pop up, so I'm keeping this PR small as suggested by your
contributor guide
Creating pid file should not belong to setting package and only web
command needs that. So this PR moves pidfile creation from setting
package to web command package to keep setting package more readable.
I marked this as `break` because the PIDFile path moved. For those who
have used the pid build argument, it has to be changed.
---------
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
hardcode the version of test_env we use in docker, so that we can use
different major versions of golang between versions of Gitea
---------
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
this is a simple endpoint that adds the ability to rename users to the
admin API.
Note: this is not in a mergeable state. It would be better if this was
handled by a PATCH/POST to the /api/v1/admin/users/{username} endpoint
and the username is modified.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Close#23411
Always pass "page" query parameter to backend, and make backend respect
it.
The `ctx.FormInt("limit")` is never used, so removed.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Support to iterator subdirectory in ObjectStorage for
ObjectStorage.Iterator method.
It's required for https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22738 to make
artifact files cleanable.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
This PR adds support for reflogs on all repositories. It does this by
adding a global configuration entry.
Implements #14865
---------
Signed-off-by: Philip Peterson <philip.c.peterson@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
* Fix scoped label left and right part breaking across lines.
* Remove slanted divider in scoped label display, make it straight.
After using this for a while, this feels more visually noisy than
helpful.
* Reduce contrast between scope and item to reduce probability of
unreadable text on background.
* Change documentation to remove mention of non-exclusive scoped labels.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22676
Context Data `IsOrganizationMember` and `IsOrganizationOwner` is used to
control the visibility of `people` and `team` tab.
2871ea0809/templates/org/menu.tmpl (L19-L40)
And because of the reuse of user projects page, User Context is changed
to Organization Context. But the value of `IsOrganizationMember` and
`IsOrganizationOwner` are not being given.
I reused func `HandleOrgAssignment` to add them to the ctx, but may have
some unnecessary variables, idk whether it is ok.
I found there is a missing `PageIsViewProjects` at create project page.
When the base repository contains multiple branches with the same
commits as the base branch, pull requests can show a long list of
commits already in the base branch as having been added.
What this is supposed to do is exclude commits already in the base
branch. But the mechansim to do so assumed a commit only exists in a
single branch. Now use `git rev-list A B --not branchName` instead of
filtering commits afterwards.
The logic to detect if there was a force push also was wrong for
multiple branches. If the old commit existed in any branch in the base
repository it would assume there was no force push. Instead check if the
old commit is an ancestor of the new commit.
Follow #22568
* Remove unnecessary ToTrustedCmdArgs calls
* the FAQ in #22678
* Quote: When using ToTrustedCmdArgs, the code will be very complex (see
the changes for examples). Then developers and reviewers can know that
something might be unreasonable.
* The `signArg` couldn't be empty, it's either `-S{keyID}` or
`--no-gpg-sign`.
* Use `signKeyID` instead, add comment "empty for no-sign, non-empty to
sign"
* 5-line code could be extracted to a common `NewGitCommandCommit()` to
handle the `signKeyID`, but I think it's not a must, current code is
clear enough.
Related to: #22294#23186#23054
Replace: #23218
Some discussion is in the comments of #23218.
Highlights:
- Add Expiration for cache context. If a cache context has been used for
more than 10s, the cache data will be ignored, and warning logs will be
printed.
- Add `discard` field to `cacheContext`, a `cacheContext` with `discard`
true will drop all cached data and won't store any new one.
- Introduce `WithNoCacheContext`, if one wants to run long-life tasks,
but the parent context is a cache context,
`WithNoCacheContext(perentCtx)` will discard the cache data, so it will
be safe to keep the context for a long time.
- It will be fine to treat an original context as a cache context, like
`GetContextData(context.Backgraud())`, no warning logs will be printed.
Some cases about nesting:
When:
- *A*, *B* or *C* means a cache context.
- ~*A*~, ~*B*~ or ~*C*~ means a discard cache context.
- `ctx` means `context.Backgrand()`
- *A(ctx)* means a cache context with `ctx` as the parent context.
- *B(A(ctx))* means a cache context with `A(ctx)` as the parent context.
- `With` means `WithCacheContext`
- `WithNo` means `WithNoCacheContext`
So:
- `With(ctx)` -> *A(ctx)*
- `With(With(ctx))` -> *A(ctx)*, not *B(A(ctx))*
- `With(With(With(ctx)))` -> *A(ctx)*, not *C(B(A(ctx)))*
- `WithNo(ctx)` -> *ctx*, not *~A~(ctx)*
- `WithNo(With(ctx))` -> *~A~(ctx)*
- `WithNo(WithNo(With(ctx)))` -> *~A~(ctx)*, not *~B~(~A~(ctx))*
- `With(WithNo(With(ctx)))` -> *B(~A~(ctx))*
- `WithNo(With(WithNo(With(ctx))))` -> *~B~(~A~(ctx))*
- `With(WithNo(With(WithNo(With(ctx)))))` -> *C(~B~(~A~(ctx)))*
