- A softbreak was being preserved during the github legacy callout (this
is likely due to a change in Goldmark) while it should not. This caused
an `<br>` to be present between the attention title and attention content.
- Added unit test.
- If a organisation is set to be limited visible, then it will still be
visible for signed-in users. However `UnitPermission` didn't take this
into account, it does now.
- Add unit test.
- Resolves#6141
This Pull Request addresses a race condition in the updateIframeHeight
function where it is sometimes called when the iframe is not fully
loaded or accessible resulting in an alarming error message for the
user.
To address this we:
1. Add defensive programming within the updateIframeHeight function
2. Delay instantiating the intersection observer until the iframe has
loaded
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 88f5d33ab267f330ffaf02eb019e772ed06ed34f)
This fixes a TODO in the code to validate the RedirectURIs when adding
or editing an OAuth application in user settings.
This also includes a refactor of the user settings tests to only create
the DB once per top-level test to avoid reloading fixtures.
(cherry picked from commit 16a7d343d78807e39df124756e5d43a69a2203a3)
Conflicts:
services/forms/user_form.go
tests/integration/user_settings_test.go
simple conflicts
Fix#29654Fix#32481
(cherry picked from commit 703be6bf307ed19ce8dc8cd311d24aeb6e5b9861)
Conflicts:
routers/api/v1/repo/file.go
routers/web/repo/repo.go
services/repository/archiver/archiver.go
services/repository/archiver/archiver_test.go
trivial context conflicts
add missing function PathParam skipped in a very large refactor
- Although sorting can be used to make the doer the first user of the
list, this isn't optimal and can be instead done with a linear search,
remove that entry and add the doer to the front of the slice.
- Extra unit test added.
- If for some reason a action log file does not longer exist in the
database or on the file system, then mark it as being cleaned up.
- Unit test added.
On postgres the new check for orphaned authorization tokens fails with:
- [E] Error: pq: syntax error at or near "." whilst counting Authorization token without existing User
Adding marks to the user table reference allows the check to succeed
This PR contains the following updates:
| Package | Type | Update | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| [globals](https://github.com/sindresorhus/globals) | devDependencies | minor | [`15.12.0` -> `15.13.0`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/globals/15.12.0/15.13.0) |
---
### Release Notes
<details>
<summary>sindresorhus/globals (globals)</summary>
### [`v15.13.0`](https://github.com/sindresorhus/globals/releases/tag/v15.13.0)
[Compare Source](https://github.com/sindresorhus/globals/compare/v15.12.0...v15.13.0)
- Update globals
***
</details>
---
### Configuration
📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - "before 4am" (UTC), Automerge - "before 4am" (UTC).
🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
â™» **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
---
- [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box
---
This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate).
<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzOS4yOC4wIiwidXBkYXRlZEluVmVyIjoiMzkuMjguMCIsInRhcmdldEJyYW5jaCI6ImZvcmdlam8iLCJsYWJlbHMiOlsiZGVwZW5kZW5jeS11cGdyYWRlIiwidGVzdC9ub3QtbmVlZGVkIl19-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6118
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
Co-committed-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
- `GetSubModules` already solely stores the URL of the submodule and not
a `*SubModule` entry, so don't try to type assert it to be a struct.
- I am not able to pinpoint when this was regressed but if I had to
guess it might be #4941.
- Added integration test.
## Scope
Intended to fix#6099; and moves related tests to integration tests (per. request https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6105#issuecomment-2486228)
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. **not applicable**
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... **not applicable**
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- Rationale: bug-fix for a change that hasn't been released yet.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6113
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Setting ENABLE_INTERNAL_SIGNIN to false will disable the built-in
signin form, should the administrator prefer to limit users to SSO.
Continuation of forgejo/forgejo#6076
