Backport #26599 by @yardenshoham
We now include the branch filler in the response.
- Closes#26591
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
(cherry picked from commit fe78aabc67)
- Follow up for: #540, #802
- Add API routes for user blocking from user and organization
perspective.
- The new routes have integration testing.
- The new model functions have unit tests.
- Actually quite boring to write and to read this pull request.
(cherry picked from commit f3afaf15c7e34038363c9ce8e1ef957ec1e22b06)
(cherry picked from commit 6d754db3e5faff93a58fab2867737f81f40f6599)
(cherry picked from commit d0fc8bc9d3b6bb189a2ab634a5329253af9b4629)
(cherry picked from commit 9a53b0d1a07455596622cb02716b476b6aaa95e4)
(cherry picked from commit 44a2a4fd48678058777d6db46c13a2c7298497d4)
(cherry picked from commit 182025db9cc76073bdb0221dfd1fb3b2b66f7fd4)
(cherry picked from commit 558a35963eddd672f1911393a649ab08a9283e5b)
- Resolves#476
- Follow up for: #540
- Ensure that the doer and blocked person cannot follow each other.
- Ensure that the block person cannot watch doer's repositories.
- Add unblock button to the blocked user list.
- Add blocked since information to the blocked user list.
- Add extra testing to moderation code.
- Blocked user will unwatch doer's owned repository upon blocking.
- Add flash messages to let the user know the block/unblock action was successful.
- Add "You haven't blocked any users" message.
- Add organization blocking a user.
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/802
(cherry picked from commit 0505a1042197bd9136b58bc70ec7400a23471585)
(cherry picked from commit 37b4e6ef9b85e97d651cf350c9f3ea272ee8d76a)
(cherry picked from commit 217475385a815298dcbd8029e0cc8cb2c5877bae)
(cherry picked from commit f2c38ce5c2f6cf4008aa1929539063715b50562c)
(cherry picked from commit 1edfb68137d8c322a7a9a7c7196fc8f01ff1a889)
(cherry picked from commit 2cbc12dc740e6fefc196b7fea6ac8a0ffbbfbeef)
(cherry picked from commit 79ff020f182327986dcfd874bc49d4fe32efc29a)
(cherry picked from commit 7b0549cd70aa7cafec853e15b25270847c59850b)
(cherry picked from commit 13e10a65d974c7b594681bfa36402a6144862116)
(cherry picked from commit 65bdd73cf27895a9fb8db2a95ef4f5b08951481d)
(cherry picked from commit 64eba8bb923176b4c286b1d0c83792f3c3005ca8)
(cherry picked from commit 4c49b1a759abe3604afc1121e83c9a942016ad6a)
(cherry picked from commit 93b4d0640683ea986657453b1fce49a00c861764)
(cherry picked from commit e2bc5f36d958f4349160ec145719c302d4023cd0)
(cherry picked from commit 2bee76f9dfa998c83ea4fe648997fad0b6224fa9)
(cherry picked from commit 3d8a1b4a9fb9dc55bbd62fd8855ea85e58dc263f)
(cherry picked from commit 99dd092cd02d7af8374acf454833ce1c05fd4fd9)
(cherry picked from commit 0fdbd02204d533f907cd22c83c73bf0156ec4a88)
(cherry picked from commit 70b277a183c0d85966fa84e9b054f164ae2d2a44)
(cherry picked from commit 3eece7fbb4e67d970d8979d0d60a58ee2a195ea5)
(cherry picked from commit 4838fc9e1145a74c56926de68854234604b5e38f)
(cherry picked from commit b76ed541cf4d73702a83d6b96f8618b6f8c44393)
(cherry picked from commit b1141cb3a1a0c602020ddff2021448a056cb3232)
(cherry picked from commit 63f4f8a1cefe10ddc4a9a589e9ae2087b78ec3c6)
(cherry picked from commit 67245f5b440c20bbd7fc039747f6b386cee3fbed)
(cherry picked from commit 19f1633fa3dcf14275fd7fcb3bb549e20ef8f688)
(cherry picked from commit 51c9663b4a4150d8ea3bdf1ef1eb157ead30046c)
- "Gitea" is automatically being determined in Swagger and cannot be
overridden, therefor we override it after `swagger generate spec` is run.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/226
(cherry picked from commit 0b453807656b6fbe54284d865e59880460f3d253)
[BRANDING] Change Swagger title to Forgejo API
(cherry picked from commit 79f6a70b53421be9984a9ad96ebd0d06ab5af02e)
(cherry picked from commit 6cd47afe3366a615d40655a435275d5543910065)
(cherry picked from commit a7ae2e4c09431cd7a1f18c5b87b9dd87981b538d)
(cherry picked from commit 59f837e4661233dafc202ded9ad907dbdf7e3e69)
(cherry picked from commit c1c3d1f0e63b880baa32d285d3eba6034137b45a)
(cherry picked from commit 4b088713fb0a55c2c37f734ce82f13190ca412dd)
(cherry picked from commit 3df1d2137112a95279a8c84a8601e4c137d75d4f)
(cherry picked from commit a4a5fdbde4f9ebbf5ba6ba66c8f20a89e54860de)
(cherry picked from commit 57aa9ed710a95aa51ae3824873c3766b38da7850)
(cherry picked from commit 948b49bf9449af744a1f2e1324187897ed1c0809)
(cherry picked from commit be4929ab6a802d7d748f537ab8b798e30588c1d4)
(cherry picked from commit 9ecb507457d8a6aa60713762a1a5d2995ed986e5)
Conflicts:
templates/swagger/ui.tmpl
(cherry picked from commit 8e57e688637b9fbd3c33d3e38aed8768a2c07208)
(cherry picked from commit f0b3f621e34130c75b35c113ad509ab73118e123)
(cherry picked from commit 5b0a6d093ea5210a5ba27705b1d1636e23da8738)
(cherry picked from commit 2e0f6b5de8837a439ecadaf3434d006d7014016c)
(cherry picked from commit bb08076f5c26481d78855823c2daa1a76d3865fb)
(cherry picked from commit 0a91a055aeb856908eb82865059c8209af5ccf0c)
(cherry picked from commit 56b404baa02bb9c53c80218ecc1380054834618a)
(cherry picked from commit c1d19c1836ba48013a64d5f95d02fd3b29b86e12)
(cherry picked from commit f9913b74294caa31d34515ea7ff1388a0d36e793)
(cherry picked from commit f0222804c9f08e96fea0c4ccbecb0b63e1d13ee7)
Backport #25476 by @GeorgDangl
In the process of doing a bit of automation via the API, we've
discovered a _small_ issue in the Swagger definition. We tried to create
a push mirror for a repository, but our generated client raised an
exception due to an unexpected status code.
When looking at this function:
3c7f5ed7b5/routers/api/v1/repo/mirror.go (L236-L240)
We see it defines `201 - Created` as response:
3c7f5ed7b5/routers/api/v1/repo/mirror.go (L260-L262)
But it actually returns `200 - OK`:
3c7f5ed7b5/routers/api/v1/repo/mirror.go (L373)
So I've just updated the Swagger definitions to match the code😀
Co-authored-by: Georg Dangl <10274404+GeorgDangl@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixes some issues with the swagger documentation for the new multiple
files API endpoint (#24887) which were overlooked when submitting the
original PR:
1. add some missing parameter descriptions
2. set correct `required` option for required parameters
3. change endpoint description to match it full functionality (every
kind of file modification is supported, not just creating and updating)
This PR creates an API endpoint for creating/updating/deleting multiple
files in one API call similar to the solution provided by
[GitLab](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/commits.html#create-a-commit-with-multiple-files-and-actions).
To archive this, the CreateOrUpdateRepoFile and DeleteRepoFIle functions
in files service are unified into one function supporting multiple files
and actions.
Resolves#14619
This adds the ability to pin important Issues and Pull Requests. You can
also move pinned Issues around to change their Position. Resolves#2175.
## Screenshots
The Design was mostly copied from the Projects Board.
## Implementation
This uses a new `pin_order` Column in the `issue` table. If the value is
set to 0, the Issue is not pinned. If it's set to a bigger value, the
value is the Position. 1 means it's the first pinned Issue, 2 means it's
the second one etc. This is dived into Issues and Pull requests for each
Repo.
## TODO
- [x] You can currently pin as many Issues as you want. Maybe we should
add a Limit, which is configurable. GitHub uses 3, but I prefer 6, as
this is better for bigger Projects, but I'm open for suggestions.
- [x] Pin and Unpin events need to be added to the Issue history.
- [x] Tests
- [x] Migration
**The feature itself is currently fully working, so tester who may find
weird edge cases are very welcome!**
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
close https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/16321
Provided a webhook trigger for requesting someone to review the Pull
Request.
Some modifications have been made to the returned `PullRequestPayload`
based on the GitHub webhook settings, including:
- add a description of the current reviewer object as
`RequestedReviewer` .
- setting the action to either **review_requested** or
**review_request_removed** based on the operation.
- adding the `RequestedReviewers` field to the issues_model.PullRequest.
This field will be loaded into the PullRequest through
`LoadRequestedReviewers()` when `ToAPIPullRequest` is called.
After the Pull Request is merged, I will supplement the relevant
documentation.
#### Added
- API: Create a branch directly from commit on the create branch API
- Added `old_ref_name` parameter to allow creating a new branch from a
specific commit, tag, or branch.
- Deprecated `old_branch_name` parameter in favor of the new
`old_ref_name` parameter.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
The `GetAllCommits` endpoint can be pretty slow, especially in repos
with a lot of commits. The issue is that it spends a lot of time
calculating information that may not be useful/needed by the user.
The `stat` param was previously added in #21337 to address this, by
allowing the user to disable the calculating stats for each commit. But
this has two issues:
1. The name `stat` is rather misleading, because disabling `stat`
disables the Stat **and** Files. This should be separated out into two
different params, because getting a list of affected files is much less
expensive than calculating the stats
2. There's still other costly information provided that the user may not
need, such as `Verification`
This PR, adds two parameters to the endpoint, `files` and `verification`
to allow the user to explicitly disable this information when listing
commits. The default behavior is true.
For my specific use case, I'd like to get all commits that are on one
branch but NOT on the other branch.
For instance, I'd like to get all the commits on `Branch1` that are not
also on `master` (I.e. all commits that were made after `Branch1` was
created).
This PR adds a `not` query param that gets passed down to the `git log`
command to allow the user to exclude items from `GetAllCommits`.
See [git
documentation](https://git-scm.com/docs/git-log#Documentation/git-log.txt---not)
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: @awkwardbunny
This PR adds a Debian package registry. You can follow [this
tutorial](https://www.baeldung.com/linux/create-debian-package) to build
a *.deb package for testing. Source packages are not supported at the
moment and I did not find documentation of the architecture "all" and
how these packages should be treated.
---------
Co-authored-by: Brian Hong <brian@hongs.me>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
This adds a API for getting License templates. This tries to be as close
to the [GitHub
API](https://docs.github.com/en/rest/licenses?apiVersion=2022-11-28) as
possible, but Gitea does not support all features that GitHub has. I
think they should been added, but this out f the scope of this PR. You
should merge #23006 before this PR for security reasons.
Closes#20955
This PR adds the possibility to disable blank Issues, when the Repo has
templates. This can be done by creating the file
`.gitea/issue_config.yaml` with the content `blank_issues_enabled` in
the Repo.
Adds API endpoints to manage issue/PR dependencies
* `GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/blocks` List issues that are
blocked by this issue
* `POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/blocks` Block the issue
given in the body by the issue in path
* `DELETE /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/blocks` Unblock the issue
given in the body by the issue in path
* `GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` List an
issue's dependencies
* `POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` Create a new
issue dependencies
* `DELETE /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` Remove an
issue dependency
Closes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/15393Closes#22115
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Remove `[repository.editor] PREVIEWABLE_FILE_MODES` setting that seemed
like it was intended to support this but did not work. Instead, whenever
viewing a file shows a preview, also have a Preview tab in the file
editor.
Add new `/markup` web and API endpoints with `comment`, `gfm`,
`markdown` and new `file` mode that uses a file path to determine the
renderer.
Remove `/markdown` web endpoint but keep the API for backwards and
GitHub compatibility.
## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️
The `[repository.editor] PREVIEWABLE_FILE_MODES` setting was removed.
This setting served no practical purpose and was not working correctly.
Instead a preview tab is always shown in the file editor when supported.
---------
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
this is a simple endpoint that adds the ability to rename users to the
admin API.
Note: this is not in a mergeable state. It would be better if this was
handled by a PATCH/POST to the /api/v1/admin/users/{username} endpoint
and the username is modified.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Close#22934
In `/user/repos` API (and other APIs related to creating repos), user
can specify a readme template for auto init. At present, if the
specified template does not exist, a `500` will be returned . This PR
improved the logic and will return a `400` instead of `500`.
This includes pull requests that you approved, requested changes or
commented on. Currently such pull requests are not visible in any of the
filters on /pulls, while they may need further action like merging, or
prodding the author or reviewers.
Especially when working with a large team on a repository it's helpful
to get a full overview of pull requests that may need your attention,
without having to sift through the complete list.
The API to create tokens is missing the ability to set the required
scopes for tokens, and to show them on the API and on the UI.
This PR adds this functionality.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Add a new "exclusive" option per label. This makes it so that when the
label is named `scope/name`, no other label with the same `scope/`
prefix can be set on an issue.
The scope is determined by the last occurence of `/`, so for example
`scope/alpha/name` and `scope/beta/name` are considered to be in
different scopes and can coexist.
Exclusive scopes are not enforced by any database rules, however they
are enforced when editing labels at the models level, automatically
removing any existing labels in the same scope when either attaching a
new label or replacing all labels.
In menus use a circle instead of checkbox to indicate they function as
radio buttons per scope. Issue filtering by label ensures that only a
single scoped label is selected at a time. Clicking with alt key can be
used to remove a scoped label, both when editing individual issues and
batch editing.
Label rendering refactor for consistency and code simplification:
* Labels now consistently have the same shape, emojis and tooltips
everywhere. This includes the label list and label assignment menus.
* In label list, show description below label same as label menus.
* Don't use exactly black/white text colors to look a bit nicer.
* Simplify text color computation. There is no point computing luminance
in linear color space, as this is a perceptual problem and sRGB is
closer to perceptually linear.
* Increase height of label assignment menus to show more labels. Showing
only 3-4 labels at a time leads to a lot of scrolling.
* Render all labels with a new RenderLabel template helper function.
Label creation and editing in multiline modal menu:
* Change label creation to open a modal menu like label editing.
* Change menu layout to place name, description and colors on separate
lines.
* Don't color cancel button red in label editing modal menu.
* Align text to the left in model menu for better readability and
consistent with settings layout elsewhere.
Custom exclusive scoped label rendering:
* Display scoped label prefix and suffix with slightly darker and
lighter background color respectively, and a slanted edge between them
similar to the `/` symbol.
* In menus exclusive labels are grouped with a divider line.
---------
Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
