(cherry picked from commit f8e1619b993943eafb8ee12bf06f4cdb5862de70)
(cherry picked from commit 46d8bc9bdf68b53767211dc103e6130f55bcdb64)
(cherry picked from commit e0c7b7055f5f4eeca84f1d0b1260b7b9622d3aab)
(cherry picked from commit faab747f8e7eb09262f755445462a77f8a6fb953)
(cherry picked from commit 46acb6a9a79e7ce588b2863aa37bf26805afb2b1)
(cherry picked from commit 22d964e74407c52ffcd3d3a84b0a66e2c186b0fa)
(cherry picked from commit 4c8a6031acf760c2383d9e103c703ee5ececb8e8)
(cherry picked from commit 032e8c7a9a357a13f41410063c2f7fb925dba5ac)
(cherry picked from commit 7a17a3b0fb979e2923019de4b9a7318f578b73b8)
(cherry picked from commit 8ea71c2a31ea7492f5f2e3de529c7fd0b232d3e3)
(cherry picked from commit 4b027e2d37cb91c5951f1d10a018778b19590eb0)
(cherry picked from commit d787089a5de09fa11f8e82a66ec43e4abdde1b2e)
(cherry picked from commit 7b9999357a5d34861b5fd7390cc400f497896246)
(cherry picked from commit 80eb531c380914c66d30a29159b81154e7adefeb)
(cherry picked from commit 373b198bfbc29855c409294ee487639f83516a55)
(cherry picked from commit 15781eedf755713ad4bbc83cf0b82e899e05d075)
(cherry picked from commit 46bdb17a2fb25c23336ef493449ff3ff0eb05409)
(cherry picked from commit 22ec6c11ee779cc06c2e6e6dca3213129033389e)
The PKCE flow according to [RFC
7636](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7636) allows for secure
authorization without the requirement to provide a client secret for the
OAuth app.
It is implemented in Gitea since #5378 (v1.8.0), however without being
able to omit client secret.
Since #21316 Gitea supports setting client type at OAuth app
registration.
As public clients are already forced to use PKCE since #21316, in this
PR the client secret check is being skipped if a public client is
detected. As Gitea seems to implement PKCE authorization correctly
according to the spec, this would allow for PKCE flow without providing
a client secret.
Also add some docs for it, please check language as I'm not a native
English speaker.
Closes#17107Closes#25047
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification.
Fix#16132
Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
The OAuth spec [defines two types of
client](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749#section-2.1),
confidential and public. Previously Gitea assumed all clients to be
confidential.
> OAuth defines two client types, based on their ability to authenticate
securely with the authorization server (i.e., ability to
> maintain the confidentiality of their client credentials):
>
> confidential
> Clients capable of maintaining the confidentiality of their
credentials (e.g., client implemented on a secure server with
> restricted access to the client credentials), or capable of secure
client authentication using other means.
>
> **public
> Clients incapable of maintaining the confidentiality of their
credentials (e.g., clients executing on the device used by the resource
owner, such as an installed native application or a web browser-based
application), and incapable of secure client authentication via any
other means.**
>
> The client type designation is based on the authorization server's
definition of secure authentication and its acceptable exposure levels
of client credentials. The authorization server SHOULD NOT make
assumptions about the client type.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8252#section-8.4
> Authorization servers MUST record the client type in the client
registration details in order to identify and process requests
accordingly.
Require PKCE for public clients:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8252#section-8.1
> Authorization servers SHOULD reject authorization requests from native
apps that don't use PKCE by returning an error message
Fixes#21299
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
According to the OAuth spec
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749#section-6 when "Refreshing
an Access Token"
> The authorization server MUST ... require client authentication for
confidential clients
Fixes#21418
Co-authored-by: Gusted <williamzijl7@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
