Commit graph

739 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Earl Warren
87c65f2a49
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments
This field adds the possibility to set the update date when modifying
an issue through the API.

A 'NoAutoDate' in-memory field is added in the Issue struct.
If the update_at field is set, NoAutoDate is set to true and the
Issue's UpdatedUnix field is filled.

That information is passed down to the functions that actually updates
the database, which have been modified to not auto update dates if
requested.

A guard is added to the 'EditIssue' API call, to checks that the
udpate_at date is between the issue's creation date and the current
date (to avoid 'malicious' changes). It also limits the new feature
to project's owners and admins.

(cherry picked from commit c524d33402c76bc4cccea2806f289e08a009baae)

Add a SetIssueUpdateDate() function in services/issue.go

That function is used by some API calls to set the NoAutoDate and
UpdatedUnix fields of an Issue if an updated_at date is provided.

(cherry picked from commit f061caa6555e0c9e922ee1e73dd2e4337360e9fe)

Add an updated_at field to the API calls related to Issue's Labels.

The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's labels.

(cherry picked from commit ea36cf80f58f0ab20c565a8f5d063b90fd741f97)

Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's attachment creation

The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's content, and is set as the
asset creation date.

(cherry picked from commit 96150971ca31b97e97e84d5f5eb95a177cc44e2e)

Checking Issue changes, with and without providing an updated_at date

Those unit tests are added:

- TestAPIEditIssueWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueWithNoAutoDate

- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithNoAutoDate

- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithNoAutoDate

(cherry picked from commit 4926a5d7a28581003545256632213bf4136b193d)

Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment creation

The update date is used as the comment creation date, and is applied to
the issue as the update creation date.

(cherry picked from commit 76c8faecdc6cba48ca4fe07d1a916d1f1a4b37b4)

Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment edition

The update date is used as the comment update date, and is applied to
the issue as an update date.

(cherry picked from commit cf787ad7fdb8e6273fdc35d7b5cc164b400207e9)

Add an updated_at field to the API call for comment's attachment creation

The update date is applied to the comment, and is set as the asset
creation date.

(cherry picked from commit 1e4ff424d39db7a4256cd9abf9c58b8d3e1b5c14)

Checking Comment changes, with and without providing an updated_at date

Those unit tests are added:

- TestAPICreateCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentWithNoAutoDate

- TestAPIEditCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithNoAutoDate

- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithNoAutoDate

(cherry picked from commit da932152f1deb3039a399516a51c8b6757059c91)

Pettier code to set the update time of comments

Now uses sess.AllCols().NoAutoToime().SetExpr("updated_unix", ...)

XORM is smart enough to compose one single SQL UPDATE which all
columns + updated_unix.

(cherry picked from commit 1f6a42808dd739c0c2e49e6b7ae2967f120f43c2)

Issue edition: Keep the max of the milestone and issue update dates.

When editing an issue via the API, an updated_at date can be provided.
If the EditIssue call changes the issue's milestone, the milestone's
update date is to be changed accordingly, but only with a greater
value.

This ensures that a milestone's update date is the max of all issue's
update dates.

(cherry picked from commit 8f22ea182e6b49e933dc6534040160dd739ff18a)

Rewrite the 'AutoDate' tests using subtests

Also add a test to check the permissions to set a date, and a test
to check update dates on milestones.

The tests related to 'AutoDate' are:
- TestAPIEditIssueAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueMilestoneAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentAutoDate

(cherry picked from commit 961fd13c551b3e50040acb7c914a00ead92de63f)
(cherry picked from commit d52f4eea44692ee773010cb66a69a603663947d5)
(cherry picked from commit 3540ea2a43155ca8cf5ab1a4a246babfb829db16)

Conflicts:
	services/issue/issue.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1415
(cherry picked from commit 56720ade008c09122d825959171aa5346d645987)

Conflicts:
	routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1462
(cherry picked from commit 47c78927d6c7e7a50298fa67efad1e73723a0981)
(cherry picked from commit 2030f3b965cde401976821083c3250b404954ecc)
(cherry picked from commit f02aeb76981cd688ceaf6613f142a8a725be1437)

Conflicts:
	routers/api/v1/repo/issue_attachment.go
	routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment_attachment.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1575
(cherry picked from commit d072525b35e44faf7ff87143c0e52b8ba8a625c8)
(cherry picked from commit 8424d0ab3df75ac3ffa30f42d398e22995ada5e7)
(cherry picked from commit 5cc62caec788b54afd9da5b9193ce06ee8ec562b)
(cherry picked from commit d6300d5dcd01c7ddc65d8b0f326f9c19cb53b58e)

[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) apply the 'update_at' value to the cross-ref comments (#1676)

[this is a follow-up to PR #764]

When a comment of issue A referencing issue B is added with a forced 'updated_at' date, that date has to be applied to the comment created in issue B.

-----

Comment:

While trying my 'RoundUp migration script', I found that this case was forgotten in PR #764 - my apologies...

I'll try to write a functional test, base on models/issues/issue_xref_test.go

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1676
Co-authored-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org>
Co-committed-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org>
(cherry picked from commit ac4f727f63a2dd746dd84a31ebf7f70d5b5d7c52)
(cherry picked from commit 5110476ee9)
(cherry picked from commit 77ba6be1da)
(cherry picked from commit 9c8337b5c442cfd72d97597c2089e776f42828b7)
(cherry picked from commit 1d689eb686f0f7df09c7861b3faf9d8683cb933b)
(cherry picked from commit 511c519c875a4c4e65c02ef0c4e3b941f4da4371)
(cherry picked from commit 2f0b4a8f610837d34844bb79cda1360ab23b6b1c)
(cherry picked from commit fdd4da111c449322901a0acf6d0857eac4716581)

[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) do not use token= query param

See https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/commit/33439b733a

(cherry picked from commit c5139a75b9e4af612a628171bd4f63a24860c272)
(cherry picked from commit c7b572c35d3e9e22017fd74045bcdc1109bd06df)
(cherry picked from commit aec7503ff6dd177980f3d9f367122ffc2fec8986)
2024-01-15 14:48:04 +00:00
Jimmy Praet
5d3fdd1212
Add branch protection setting for ignoring stale approvals (#28498)
Fixes #27114.

* In Gitea 1.12 (#9532), a "dismiss stale approvals" branch protection
setting was introduced, for ignoring stale reviews when verifying the
approval count of a pull request.
* In Gitea 1.14 (#12674), the "dismiss review" feature was added.
* This caused confusion with users (#25858), as "dismiss" now means 2
different things.
* In Gitea 1.20 (#25882), the behavior of the "dismiss stale approvals"
branch protection was modified to actually dismiss the stale review.

For some users this new behavior of dismissing the stale reviews is not
desirable.

So this PR reintroduces the old behavior as a new "ignore stale
approvals" branch protection setting.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2024-01-15 07:20:01 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
70c4aad8e1
Move more functions to db.Find (#28419)
Following #28220

This PR move more functions to use `db.Find`.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2024-01-15 02:19:25 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
97292da960
Fix schedule tasks bugs (#28691)
Fix #28157 

This PR fix the possible bugs about actions schedule.

## The Changes

- Move `UpdateRepositoryUnit` and `SetRepoDefaultBranch` from models to
service layer
- Remove schedules plan from database and cancel waiting & running
schedules tasks in this repository when actions unit has been disabled
or global disabled.
- Remove schedules plan from database and cancel waiting & running
schedules tasks in this repository when default branch changed.
2024-01-12 21:50:38 +00:00
Nanguan Lin
9b59af37e7
Fix issue dependencies (#27736)
Fix #27722 
Fix #27357
Fix #25837 
1. Fix the typo `BlockingByDependenciesNotPermitted`, which causes the
`not permitted message` not to show. The correct one is `Blocking` or
`BlockedBy`
2. Rewrite the perm check. The perm check uses a very tricky way to
avoid duplicate checks for a slice of issues, which is confusing. In
fact, it's also the reason causing the bug. It uses `lastRepoID` and
`lastPerm` to avoid duplicate checks, but forgets to assign the
`lastPerm` at the end of the code block. So I rewrote this to avoid this
trick.
![I U1AT{GNFY3
1HZ`6L{(2L](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/70063547/79acd02a-a567-4316-ae0d-11c6461becf1)
3. It also reuses the `blocks` slice, which is even more confusing. So I
rewrote this too.

![UARFPXRGGZQFB7J$2`R}5_R](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/70063547/f21cff0f-d9ac-4ce4-ae4d-adffc98ecd99)
2024-01-12 16:49:02 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
baf0d402d9
Add get actions runner registration token for API routes, repo, org, user and global level (#27144)
Replace #23761

---------

Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <kontakt@denyskon.de>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
2023-12-27 07:57:54 +00:00
delvh
778ad795fd
Refactor deletion (#28610)
Introduce the new generic deletion methods
- `func DeleteByID[T any](ctx context.Context, id int64) (int64, error)`
- `func DeleteByIDs[T any](ctx context.Context, ids ...int64) error`
- `func Delete[T any](ctx context.Context, opts FindOptions) (int64,
error)`

So, we no longer need any specific deletion method and can just use
the generic ones instead.

Replacement of #28450

Closes #28450

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-12-25 21:25:29 +01:00
Lunny Xiao
408a484224
Adjust object format interface (#28469)
- Remove `ObjectFormatID`
- Remove function `ObjectFormatFromID`.
- Use `Sha1ObjectFormat` directly but not a pointer because it's an
empty struct.
- Store `ObjectFormatName` in `repository` struct
2023-12-17 11:56:08 +00:00
Adam Majer
cbf923e87b
Abstract hash function usage (#28138)
Refactor Hash interfaces and centralize hash function. This will allow
easier introduction of different hash function later on.

This forms the "no-op" part of the SHA256 enablement patch.
2023-12-13 21:02:00 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
537fa69962
Second part of refactor db.Find (#28194)
Continue of #27798 and move more functions to `db.Find` and `db.Count`.
2023-12-11 16:56:48 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
aeb383025f
Also sync DB branches on push if necessary (#28361)
Fix #28056 

This PR will check whether the repo has zero branch when pushing a
branch. If that, it means this repository hasn't been synced.

The reason caused that is after user upgrade from v1.20 -> v1.21, he
just push branches without visit the repository user interface. Because
all repositories routers will check whether a branches sync is necessary
but push has not such check.

For every repository, it has two states, synced or not synced. If there
is zero branch for a repository, then it will be assumed as non-sync
state. Otherwise, it's synced state. So if we think it's synced, we just
need to update branch/insert new branch. Otherwise do a full sync. So
that, for every push, there will be almost no extra load added. It's
high performance than yours.

For the implementation, we in fact will try to update the branch first,
if updated success with affect records > 0, then all are done. Because
that means the branch has been in the database. If no record is
affected, that means the branch does not exist in database. So there are
two possibilities. One is this is a new branch, then we just need to
insert the record. Another is the branches haven't been synced, then we
need to sync all the branches into database.
2023-12-09 13:30:56 +00:00
Nanguan Lin
0aab2d38a7
Remove deprecated query condition in ListReleases (#28339)
close #24057 
call stack: 

25faee3c5f/routers/api/v1/repo/release.go (L154)

ec1feedbf5/routers/api/v1/utils/page.go (L13-L18)

ec1feedbf5/services/convert/utils.go (L15-L22)

## ⚠️ Breaking   ⚠️ (though it's not caused by this PR)
Do not use `per_page` to specify pagination; use `limit` instead
2023-12-05 07:30:43 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
882e502327
Fix comment permissions (#28213)
This PR will fix some missed checks for private repositories' data on
web routes and API routes.
2023-11-25 17:21:21 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
df1e7d0067
Use db.Find instead of writing methods for every object (#28084)
For those simple objects, it's unnecessary to write the find and count
methods again and again.
2023-11-24 03:49:41 +00:00
silverwind
ce83609ff6
Upgrade to golangci-lint@v1.55.0 (#27756)
https://github.com/golangci/golangci-lint/releases/tag/v1.55.0
2023-10-24 02:54:59 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
9852c92e9a
Remove unnecessary parameter (#27671) 2023-10-18 15:03:10 +00:00
JakobDev
76a85a4ce9
Final round of db.DefaultContext refactor (#27587)
Last part of #27065
2023-10-14 08:37:24 +00:00
JakobDev
ebe803e514
Penultimate round of db.DefaultContext refactor (#27414)
Part of #27065

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-10-11 04:24:07 +00:00
Michael Santos
5283ce9650
api: GetPullRequestCommits: return file list (#27483)
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/27481

----

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-10-09 11:22:12 +00:00
JakobDev
f2b2608a86
Don't let API add 2 exclusive labels from same scope (#27433)
Fixes #27380
2023-10-05 03:37:36 +00:00
JakobDev
cc5df26680
Even more db.DefaultContext refactor (#27352)
Part of #27065

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-10-03 10:30:41 +00:00
JakobDev
cf0df023be
More db.DefaultContext refactor (#27265)
Part of #27065

This PR touches functions used in templates. As templates are not static
typed, errors are harder to find, but I hope I catch it all. I think
some tests from other persons do not hurt.
2023-09-29 12:12:54 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
673cf6af76
make writing main test easier (#27270)
This PR removed `unittest.MainTest` the second parameter
`TestOptions.GiteaRoot`. Now it detects the root directory by current
working directory.

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-09-28 01:38:53 +00:00
JakobDev
7047df36d4
Another round of db.DefaultContext refactor (#27103)
Part of #27065

---------

Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
2023-09-25 13:17:37 +00:00
JakobDev
28f9b313ba
Updates to the API for archived repos (#27149) 2023-09-21 23:43:29 +00:00
KN4CK3R
c766140dad
Add RemoteAddress to mirrors (#26952)
This PR adds a new field `RemoteAddress` to both mirror types which
contains the sanitized remote address for easier (database) access to
that information. Will be used in the audit PR if merged.
2023-09-16 16:03:02 +00:00
JakobDev
f91dbbba98
Next round of db.DefaultContext refactor (#27089)
Part of #27065
2023-09-16 14:39:12 +00:00
JakobDev
c548dde205
More refactoring of db.DefaultContext (#27083)
Next step of #27065
2023-09-15 06:13:19 +00:00
JakobDev
76659b1114
Reduce usage of db.DefaultContext (#27073)
Part of #27065

This reduces the usage of `db.DefaultContext`. I think I've got enough
files for the first PR. When this is merged, I will continue working on
this.

Considering how many files this PR affect, I hope it won't take to long
to merge, so I don't end up in the merge conflict hell.

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-09-14 17:09:32 +00:00
JakobDev
aaeec2a392
Add missing 404 response to Swagger (#27038)
Most middleware throw a 404 in case something is not found e.g. a Repo
that is not existing. But most API endpoints don't include the 404
response in their documentation. This PR changes this.
2023-09-13 10:37:54 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
e3ed67859a
Move some functions to service layer (#26969) 2023-09-08 21:09:23 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
4f32abaf94
move repository deletion to service layer (#26948)
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-09-08 04:51:15 +00:00
CaiCandong
a78c2eae24
Replace util.SliceXxx with slices.Xxx (#26958) 2023-09-07 09:37:47 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
b9df9fa2e2
Move createrepository from module to service layer (#26927)
Repository creation depends on many models, so moving it to service
layer is better.
2023-09-06 12:08:51 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
540bf9fa6d
Move notification interface to services layer (#26915)
Extract from #22266
2023-09-05 18:37:47 +00:00
KN4CK3R
a99b96cbcd
Refactor secrets modification logic (#26873)
- Share code between web and api
- Add some tests
2023-09-05 15:21:02 +00:00
Zettat123
04771b5ff7
Allow users with write permissions for issues to add attachments with API (#26837)
Fixes #24944

Since a user with write permissions for issues can add attachments to an
issue via the the web interface, the user should also be able to add
attachments via the API
2023-09-01 15:35:38 +00:00
Bo-Yi Wu
9eb4a9e601
feat(API): add secret deletion functionality for repository (#26808)
- Modify the `CreateOrUpdateSecret` function in `api.go` to include a
`Delete` operation for the secret
- Modify the `DeleteOrgSecret` function in `action.go` to include a
`DeleteSecret` operation for the organization
- Modify the `DeleteSecret` function in `action.go` to include a
`DeleteSecret` operation for the repository
- Modify the `v1_json.tmpl` template file to update the `operationId`
and `summary` for the `deleteSecret` operation in both the organization
and repository sections

---------

Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
2023-09-01 13:02:49 +00:00
wxiaoguang
e8aae43f56
Move web/api context related testing function into a separate package (#26859)
Just like `models/unittest`, the testing helper functions should be in a
separate package: `contexttest`

And complete the TODO:

> // TODO: move this function to other packages, because it depends on
"models" package
2023-09-01 11:26:07 +00:00
Bo-Yi Wu
b91057b172
feat(API): add route and implementation for creating/updating repository secret (#26766)
spec:
https://docs.github.com/en/rest/actions/secrets?apiVersion=2022-11-28#create-or-update-a-repository-secret

- Add a new route for creating or updating a secret value in a
repository
- Create a new file `routers/api/v1/repo/action.go` with the
implementation of the `CreateOrUpdateSecret` function
- Update the Swagger documentation for the `updateRepoSecret` operation
in the `v1_json.tmpl` template file

---------

Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-08-29 20:54:49 +00:00
Chongyi Zheng
ad43486cd3
Fix some slice append usages (#26778)
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-08-29 15:47:26 +00:00
Chongyi Zheng
43652746f2
Move modules/mirror to services (#26737)
To solve the cyclic imports in a better way

Closes #20261
2023-08-27 10:24:45 +08:00
Infinoid
86ee5b4b1b
PATCH branch-protection updates check list even when checks are disabled (#26351)
Fixes: #26333.

Previously, this endpoint only updates the `StatusCheckContexts` field
when `EnableStatusCheck==true`, which makes it impossible to clear the
array otherwise.

This patch uses slice `nil`-ness to decide whether to update the list of
checks. The field is ignored when either the client explicitly passes in
a null, or just omits the field from the json ([which causes
`json.Unmarshal` to leave the struct field
unchanged](https://go.dev/play/p/Z2XHOILuB1Q)). I think this is a better
measure of intent than whether the `EnableStatusCheck` flag was set,
because it matches the semantics of other field types.

Also adds a test case. I noticed that [`testAPIEditBranchProtection`
only checks the branch
name](c1c83dbaec/tests/integration/api_branch_test.go (L68))
and no other fields, so I added some extra `GET` calls and specific
checks to make sure the fields are changing properly.

I added those checks the existing integration test; is that the right
place for it?
2023-08-24 05:36:04 +00:00
Jason Song
b658f2c61b
Return empty when searching issues with no repos (#26545) 2023-08-17 12:42:17 -05:00
puni9869
cafce3b4b5
Allow to archive labels (#26478)
## Archived labels 

This adds the structure to allow for archived labels.
Archived labels are, just like closed milestones or projects, a medium to hide information without deleting it.
It is especially useful if there are outdated labels that should no longer be used without deleting the label entirely.

## Changes

1. UI and API have been equipped with the support to mark a label as archived
2. The time when a label has been archived will be stored in the DB

## Outsourced for the future

There's no special handling for archived labels at the moment.
This will be done in the future.

## Screenshots

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/80308335/208f95cd-42e4-4ed7-9a1f-cd2050a645d4)

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/80308335/746428e0-40bb-45b3-b992-85602feb371d)

Part of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/25237

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-08-14 11:56:14 +02:00
wxiaoguang
c2e0143bfe
Introduce ctx.PathParamRaw to avoid incorrect unescaping (#26392)
Fix #26389

And complete an old TODO: `ctx.Params does un-escaping,..., which is
incorrect.`
2023-08-09 14:57:45 +08:00
Jason Song
1e76a824bc
Refactor and enhance issue indexer to support both searching, filtering and paging (#26012)
Fix #24662.

Replace #24822 and #25708 (although it has been merged)


## Background

In the past, Gitea supported issue searching with a keyword and
conditions in a less efficient way. It worked by searching for issues
with the keyword and obtaining limited IDs (as it is heavy to get all)
on the indexer (bleve/elasticsearch/meilisearch), and then querying with
conditions on the database to find a subset of the found IDs. This is
why the results could be incomplete.

To solve this issue, we need to store all fields that could be used as
conditions in the indexer and support both keyword and additional
conditions when searching with the indexer.

## Major changes

- Redefine `IndexerData` to include all fields that could be used as
filter conditions.
- Refactor `Search(ctx context.Context, kw string, repoIDs []int64,
limit, start int, state string)` to `Search(ctx context.Context, options
*SearchOptions)`, so it supports more conditions now.
- Change the data type stored in `issueIndexerQueue`. Use
`IndexerMetadata` instead of `IndexerData` in case the data has been
updated while it is in the queue. This also reduces the storage size of
the queue.
- Enhance searching with Bleve/Elasticsearch/Meilisearch, make them
fully support `SearchOptions`. Also, update the data versions.
- Keep most logic of database indexer, but remove
`issues.SearchIssueIDsByKeyword` in `models` to avoid confusion where is
the entry point to search issues.
- Start a Meilisearch instance to test it in unit tests.
- Add unit tests with almost full coverage to test
Bleve/Elasticsearch/Meilisearch indexer.

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-07-31 06:28:53 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
b167f35113
Add context parameter to some database functions (#26055)
To avoid deadlock problem, almost database related functions should be
have ctx as the first parameter.
This PR do a refactor for some of these functions.
2023-07-22 22:14:27 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
037c9895a7
Support copy protected branch from template repository (#25889)
Fix #14303
2023-07-21 12:32:47 +08:00
wxiaoguang
236c645bf1
Refactor "Content" for file uploading (#25851)
Before: the concept "Content string" is used everywhere. It has some
problems:

1. Sometimes it means "base64 encoded content", sometimes it means "raw
binary content"
2. It doesn't work with large files, eg: uploading a 1G LFS file would
make Gitea process OOM

This PR does the refactoring: use "ContentReader" / "ContentBase64"
instead of "Content"

This PR is not breaking because the key in API JSON is still "content":
`` ContentBase64 string `json:"content"` ``
2023-07-18 18:14:47 +00:00