Signed-off-by: cassiozareck <cassiomilczareck@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit a878adfe628cf6dc367a17c3715fcd3499aa02b6)
Adding description and Forgejo SVG
(cherry picked from commit 13738c03804d019f28550e46a4ebc37dbe3a5cfc)
Undo reordering and tmpl redirection
(cherry picked from commit 9ae51c46f42acecac834371857e638098ebf6d27)
(cherry picked from commit 70fffdc61d06dd1d70b6a31496676a23d3d0c2fc)
(cherry picked from commit c0ebfa9da3db3e60d7b403a1bf8b8a19c32c5dc7)
(cherry picked from commit 9922c92787eccaba0021486ba0a3eb28583969e1)
(cherry picked from commit 00c0effbc74aedc7a4167a69c8a410ef324d576b)
(cherry picked from commit e4c9525b137205fa9ffdb4e0d7492bbbda9be6b5)
(cherry picked from commit 09d7b83211652d045975b0e3bb790856267d52a5)
(cherry picked from commit bbcd5975c91f6932f7f2ee07fbd63e84560ba96a)
(cherry picked from commit 55c70a0e18d33d8ac0da9ffb97f6d994ed88a319)
(cherry picked from commit 76596410c0dd0137cd497c9728c3e1d1c98f2430)
(cherry picked from commit 1308043931388bf6de691ad0f766861b77fb08a5)
(cherry picked from commit 919d6aedfed6abc8ec9def19f8deec2ee413252b)
[FEAT] add Forgero Git Service (squash) more tests
Previously only Gitea service was being tested under self-hosted migrations. Since Forgejo is also self-hosted and in fact use the same downloader/migrator we can add to this suite another test that will do the same, migrating the same repository under the same local instance but for the Forgejo service (represented by 9)
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1709
Co-authored-by: zareck <cassiomilczareck@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: zareck <cassiomilczareck@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 40a4b8f1a8637f78cf2f48104f0b336377652df9)
Some translations are duplicated for the same package fields; it should
be possible to use the same approach. Checked packages to use the same
forms in templates.
1. Removed repeated translations for the same fields
2. Linked template files to the same translation fields
3. Added repository site link for nuget packages
* Show checkout instructions also when there is no permission to push,
for anyone who wants to locally test the changes.
* First checkout the branch exactly as is, without immediately having to
solve merge conflicts. Leave this to the merge step, since it's often
convenient to test a change without worrying about this.
* Use `git fetch -u`, so an existing local branch is updated when
re-testing the same pull request. But not the more risky `git fetch -f`
in to handle force pushes, as we don't want to accidentally overwrite
important local changes.
* Show different merge command depending on the chosen merge style,
interactively updated.
This PR will show the _noreply_ address in the privacy popup
_keep_email_private_popup_.
I had to look into the source code to figure out which E-Mail Adress I
had to use on gitea.com to hide it from public access.
According to the contribution guidelines I only updated the en-US
translation file.
Co-authored-by: Hakito <hakito@git.example.com>
Per the discussion on #22054, the flow for adding a new team member to
an org is not intuitive for new Gitea users.
The ideal solution would be to add a new button on the Org > Members
index view (see the screenshot mockup in the issue description).
However, this would require a refactor of the UX for the flow. The
current flow has an implicit context of which team within the org the
new member is being added to ('Owners' by default). From the Members
index, there is no implicit context; the flow would have to add a picker
for which team the new member should be added to.
So, as a stopgap, this change simply adds a button to the Teams index
page that performs the same action as clicking on the title of the team
(a behavior that is currently too obscure as indicated in the comments
on the issue). This should reduce support burden and serve as a decent
temporary measure until the Add Member flow is refactored.
---------
Co-authored-by: tomholford <tomholford@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#27455
> The mechanism responsible for long-term authentication (the 'remember
me' cookie) uses a weak construction technique. It will hash the user's
hashed password and the rands value; it will then call the secure cookie
code, which will encrypt the user's name with the computed hash. If one
were able to dump the database, they could extract those two values to
rebuild that cookie and impersonate a user. That vulnerability exists
from the date the dump was obtained until a user changed their password.
>
> To fix this security issue, the cookie could be created and verified
using a different technique such as the one explained at
https://paragonie.com/blog/2015/04/secure-authentication-php-with-long-term-persistence#secure-remember-me-cookies.
The PR removes the now obsolete setting `COOKIE_USERNAME`.
This PR reduces the complexity of the system setting system.
It only needs one line to introduce a new option, and the option can be
used anywhere out-of-box.
It is still high-performant (and more performant) because the config
values are cached in the config system.
- switch from some weird status badge to label
- translate untranslated `Reset registration token` string
- change documentation link from act_runner README to Gitea Docs site
- fix "No runners available" message width
- use `ctx.Locale.Tr` where possible
