forgejo/services/issue/issue.go

337 lines
10 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2019 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
package issue
import (
"context"
"fmt"
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments This field adds the possibility to set the update date when modifying an issue through the API. A 'NoAutoDate' in-memory field is added in the Issue struct. If the update_at field is set, NoAutoDate is set to true and the Issue's UpdatedUnix field is filled. That information is passed down to the functions that actually updates the database, which have been modified to not auto update dates if requested. A guard is added to the 'EditIssue' API call, to checks that the udpate_at date is between the issue's creation date and the current date (to avoid 'malicious' changes). It also limits the new feature to project's owners and admins. (cherry picked from commit c524d33402c76bc4cccea2806f289e08a009baae) Add a SetIssueUpdateDate() function in services/issue.go That function is used by some API calls to set the NoAutoDate and UpdatedUnix fields of an Issue if an updated_at date is provided. (cherry picked from commit f061caa6555e0c9e922ee1e73dd2e4337360e9fe) Add an updated_at field to the API calls related to Issue's Labels. The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform about the modification of the issue's labels. (cherry picked from commit ea36cf80f58f0ab20c565a8f5d063b90fd741f97) Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's attachment creation The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform about the modification of the issue's content, and is set as the asset creation date. (cherry picked from commit 96150971ca31b97e97e84d5f5eb95a177cc44e2e) Checking Issue changes, with and without providing an updated_at date Those unit tests are added: - TestAPIEditIssueWithAutoDate - TestAPIEditIssueWithNoAutoDate - TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithAutoDate - TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithNoAutoDate - TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithAutoDate - TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithNoAutoDate (cherry picked from commit 4926a5d7a28581003545256632213bf4136b193d) Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment creation The update date is used as the comment creation date, and is applied to the issue as the update creation date. (cherry picked from commit 76c8faecdc6cba48ca4fe07d1a916d1f1a4b37b4) Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment edition The update date is used as the comment update date, and is applied to the issue as an update date. (cherry picked from commit cf787ad7fdb8e6273fdc35d7b5cc164b400207e9) Add an updated_at field to the API call for comment's attachment creation The update date is applied to the comment, and is set as the asset creation date. (cherry picked from commit 1e4ff424d39db7a4256cd9abf9c58b8d3e1b5c14) Checking Comment changes, with and without providing an updated_at date Those unit tests are added: - TestAPICreateCommentWithAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentWithNoAutoDate - TestAPIEditCommentWithAutoDate - TestAPIEditCommentWithNoAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithNoAutoDate (cherry picked from commit da932152f1deb3039a399516a51c8b6757059c91) Pettier code to set the update time of comments Now uses sess.AllCols().NoAutoToime().SetExpr("updated_unix", ...) XORM is smart enough to compose one single SQL UPDATE which all columns + updated_unix. (cherry picked from commit 1f6a42808dd739c0c2e49e6b7ae2967f120f43c2) Issue edition: Keep the max of the milestone and issue update dates. When editing an issue via the API, an updated_at date can be provided. If the EditIssue call changes the issue's milestone, the milestone's update date is to be changed accordingly, but only with a greater value. This ensures that a milestone's update date is the max of all issue's update dates. (cherry picked from commit 8f22ea182e6b49e933dc6534040160dd739ff18a) Rewrite the 'AutoDate' tests using subtests Also add a test to check the permissions to set a date, and a test to check update dates on milestones. The tests related to 'AutoDate' are: - TestAPIEditIssueAutoDate - TestAPIAddIssueLabelsAutoDate - TestAPIEditIssueMilestoneAutoDate - TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentAutoDate - TestAPIEditCommentWithDate - TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentAutoDate (cherry picked from commit 961fd13c551b3e50040acb7c914a00ead92de63f) (cherry picked from commit d52f4eea44692ee773010cb66a69a603663947d5) (cherry picked from commit 3540ea2a43155ca8cf5ab1a4a246babfb829db16) Conflicts: services/issue/issue.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1415 (cherry picked from commit 56720ade008c09122d825959171aa5346d645987) Conflicts: routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1462 (cherry picked from commit 47c78927d6c7e7a50298fa67efad1e73723a0981) (cherry picked from commit 2030f3b965cde401976821083c3250b404954ecc) (cherry picked from commit f02aeb76981cd688ceaf6613f142a8a725be1437) Conflicts: routers/api/v1/repo/issue_attachment.go routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment_attachment.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1575 (cherry picked from commit d072525b35e44faf7ff87143c0e52b8ba8a625c8) (cherry picked from commit 8424d0ab3df75ac3ffa30f42d398e22995ada5e7) (cherry picked from commit 5cc62caec788b54afd9da5b9193ce06ee8ec562b) (cherry picked from commit d6300d5dcd01c7ddc65d8b0f326f9c19cb53b58e) [FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) apply the 'update_at' value to the cross-ref comments (#1676) [this is a follow-up to PR #764] When a comment of issue A referencing issue B is added with a forced 'updated_at' date, that date has to be applied to the comment created in issue B. ----- Comment: While trying my 'RoundUp migration script', I found that this case was forgotten in PR #764 - my apologies... I'll try to write a functional test, base on models/issues/issue_xref_test.go Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1676 Co-authored-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org> Co-committed-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org> (cherry picked from commit ac4f727f63a2dd746dd84a31ebf7f70d5b5d7c52)
2023-10-09 19:07:47 +02:00
"time"
activities_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/activities"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/db"
issues_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/issues"
access_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/perm/access"
project_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/project"
repo_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/repo"
system_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/system"
user_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/user"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/git"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/storage"
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments This field adds the possibility to set the update date when modifying an issue through the API. A 'NoAutoDate' in-memory field is added in the Issue struct. If the update_at field is set, NoAutoDate is set to true and the Issue's UpdatedUnix field is filled. That information is passed down to the functions that actually updates the database, which have been modified to not auto update dates if requested. A guard is added to the 'EditIssue' API call, to checks that the udpate_at date is between the issue's creation date and the current date (to avoid 'malicious' changes). It also limits the new feature to project's owners and admins. (cherry picked from commit c524d33402c76bc4cccea2806f289e08a009baae) Add a SetIssueUpdateDate() function in services/issue.go That function is used by some API calls to set the NoAutoDate and UpdatedUnix fields of an Issue if an updated_at date is provided. (cherry picked from commit f061caa6555e0c9e922ee1e73dd2e4337360e9fe) Add an updated_at field to the API calls related to Issue's Labels. The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform about the modification of the issue's labels. (cherry picked from commit ea36cf80f58f0ab20c565a8f5d063b90fd741f97) Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's attachment creation The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform about the modification of the issue's content, and is set as the asset creation date. (cherry picked from commit 96150971ca31b97e97e84d5f5eb95a177cc44e2e) Checking Issue changes, with and without providing an updated_at date Those unit tests are added: - TestAPIEditIssueWithAutoDate - TestAPIEditIssueWithNoAutoDate - TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithAutoDate - TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithNoAutoDate - TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithAutoDate - TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithNoAutoDate (cherry picked from commit 4926a5d7a28581003545256632213bf4136b193d) Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment creation The update date is used as the comment creation date, and is applied to the issue as the update creation date. (cherry picked from commit 76c8faecdc6cba48ca4fe07d1a916d1f1a4b37b4) Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment edition The update date is used as the comment update date, and is applied to the issue as an update date. (cherry picked from commit cf787ad7fdb8e6273fdc35d7b5cc164b400207e9) Add an updated_at field to the API call for comment's attachment creation The update date is applied to the comment, and is set as the asset creation date. (cherry picked from commit 1e4ff424d39db7a4256cd9abf9c58b8d3e1b5c14) Checking Comment changes, with and without providing an updated_at date Those unit tests are added: - TestAPICreateCommentWithAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentWithNoAutoDate - TestAPIEditCommentWithAutoDate - TestAPIEditCommentWithNoAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithNoAutoDate (cherry picked from commit da932152f1deb3039a399516a51c8b6757059c91) Pettier code to set the update time of comments Now uses sess.AllCols().NoAutoToime().SetExpr("updated_unix", ...) XORM is smart enough to compose one single SQL UPDATE which all columns + updated_unix. (cherry picked from commit 1f6a42808dd739c0c2e49e6b7ae2967f120f43c2) Issue edition: Keep the max of the milestone and issue update dates. When editing an issue via the API, an updated_at date can be provided. If the EditIssue call changes the issue's milestone, the milestone's update date is to be changed accordingly, but only with a greater value. This ensures that a milestone's update date is the max of all issue's update dates. (cherry picked from commit 8f22ea182e6b49e933dc6534040160dd739ff18a) Rewrite the 'AutoDate' tests using subtests Also add a test to check the permissions to set a date, and a test to check update dates on milestones. The tests related to 'AutoDate' are: - TestAPIEditIssueAutoDate - TestAPIAddIssueLabelsAutoDate - TestAPIEditIssueMilestoneAutoDate - TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentAutoDate - TestAPIEditCommentWithDate - TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentAutoDate (cherry picked from commit 961fd13c551b3e50040acb7c914a00ead92de63f) (cherry picked from commit d52f4eea44692ee773010cb66a69a603663947d5) (cherry picked from commit 3540ea2a43155ca8cf5ab1a4a246babfb829db16) Conflicts: services/issue/issue.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1415 (cherry picked from commit 56720ade008c09122d825959171aa5346d645987) Conflicts: routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1462 (cherry picked from commit 47c78927d6c7e7a50298fa67efad1e73723a0981) (cherry picked from commit 2030f3b965cde401976821083c3250b404954ecc) (cherry picked from commit f02aeb76981cd688ceaf6613f142a8a725be1437) Conflicts: routers/api/v1/repo/issue_attachment.go routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment_attachment.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1575 (cherry picked from commit d072525b35e44faf7ff87143c0e52b8ba8a625c8) (cherry picked from commit 8424d0ab3df75ac3ffa30f42d398e22995ada5e7) (cherry picked from commit 5cc62caec788b54afd9da5b9193ce06ee8ec562b) (cherry picked from commit d6300d5dcd01c7ddc65d8b0f326f9c19cb53b58e) [FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) apply the 'update_at' value to the cross-ref comments (#1676) [this is a follow-up to PR #764] When a comment of issue A referencing issue B is added with a forced 'updated_at' date, that date has to be applied to the comment created in issue B. ----- Comment: While trying my 'RoundUp migration script', I found that this case was forgotten in PR #764 - my apologies... I'll try to write a functional test, base on models/issues/issue_xref_test.go Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1676 Co-authored-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org> Co-committed-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org> (cherry picked from commit ac4f727f63a2dd746dd84a31ebf7f70d5b5d7c52)
2023-10-09 19:07:47 +02:00
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/timeutil"
notify_service "code.gitea.io/gitea/services/notify"
)
// NewIssue creates new issue with labels for repository.
func NewIssue(ctx context.Context, repo *repo_model.Repository, issue *issues_model.Issue, labelIDs []int64, uuids []string, assigneeIDs []int64) error {
[MODERATION] User blocking - Add the ability to block a user via their profile page. - This will unstar their repositories and visa versa. - Blocked users cannot create issues or pull requests on your the doer's repositories (mind that this is not the case for organizations). - Blocked users cannot comment on the doer's opened issues or pull requests. - Blocked users cannot add reactions to doer's comments. - Blocked users cannot cause a notification trough mentioning the doer. Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/540 (cherry picked from commit 687d852480388897db4d7b0cb397cf7135ab97b1) (cherry picked from commit 0c32a4fde531018f74e01d9db6520895fcfa10cc) (cherry picked from commit 1791130e3cb8470b9b39742e0004d5e4c7d1e64d) (cherry picked from commit 37858b7e8fb6ba6c6ea0ac2562285b3b144efa19) (cherry picked from commit a3e2bfd7e9eab82cc2c17061f6bb4e386a108c46) (cherry picked from commit 7009b9fe87696b6182fab65ae82bf5a25cd39971) Conflicts: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1014 routers/web/user/profile.go templates/user/profile.tmpl (cherry picked from commit b2aec3479177e725cfc7cbbb9d94753226928d1c) (cherry picked from commit e2f1b73752f6bd3f830297d8f4ac438837471226) [MODERATION] organization blocking a user (#802) - Resolves #476 - Follow up for: #540 - Ensure that the doer and blocked person cannot follow each other. - Ensure that the block person cannot watch doer's repositories. - Add unblock button to the blocked user list. - Add blocked since information to the blocked user list. - Add extra testing to moderation code. - Blocked user will unwatch doer's owned repository upon blocking. - Add flash messages to let the user know the block/unblock action was successful. - Add "You haven't blocked any users" message. - Add organization blocking a user. Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/802 (cherry picked from commit 0505a1042197bd9136b58bc70ec7400a23471585) (cherry picked from commit 37b4e6ef9b85e97d651cf350c9f3ea272ee8d76a) (cherry picked from commit c17c121f2cf1f00e2a8d6fd6847705df47d0771e) [MODERATION] organization blocking a user (#802) (squash) Changes to adapt to: 6bbccdd177 Improve AJAX link and modal confirm dialog (#25210) Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/882/files#issuecomment-945962 Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/882#issue-330561 (cherry picked from commit 523635f83cb2a1a4386769b79326088c5c4bbec7) (cherry picked from commit 4743eaa6a0be0ef47de5b17c211dfe8bad1b7af9) (cherry picked from commit eff5b43d2e843d5d537756d4fa58a8a010b6b527) Conflicts: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1014 routers/web/user/profile.go (cherry picked from commit 9d359be5ed11237088ccf6328571939af814984e) (cherry picked from commit b1f3069a22a03734cffbfcd503ce004ba47561b7) [MODERATION] add user blocking API - Follow up for: #540, #802 - Add API routes for user blocking from user and organization perspective. - The new routes have integration testing. - The new model functions have unit tests. - Actually quite boring to write and to read this pull request. (cherry picked from commit f3afaf15c7e34038363c9ce8e1ef957ec1e22b06) (cherry picked from commit 6d754db3e5faff93a58fab2867737f81f40f6599) (cherry picked from commit 2a89ddc0acffa9aea0f02b721934ef9e2b496a88) (cherry picked from commit 4a147bff7e963ab9dffcfaefa5c2c01c59b4c732) Conflicts: routers/api/v1/api.go templates/swagger/v1_json.tmpl (cherry picked from commit bb8c33918569f65f25b014f0d7fe6ac20f9036fc) (cherry picked from commit 5a11569a011b7d0a14391e2b5c07d0af825d7b0e) (cherry picked from commit 2373c801ee6b84c368b498b16e6ad18650b38f42) [MODERATION] restore redirect on unblock ctx.RedirectToFirst(ctx.FormString("redirect_to"), ctx.ContextUser.HomeLink()) was replaced by ctx.JSONOK() in 128d77a3a Following up fixes for "Fix inconsistent user profile layout across tabs" (#25739) thus changing the behavior (nicely spotted by the tests). This restores it. (cherry picked from commit 597c243707c3c86e7256faf1e6ba727224554de3) (cherry picked from commit cfa539e590127b4b953b010fba3dea21c82a1714) [MODERATION] Add test case (squash) - Add an test case, to test an property of the function. (cherry picked from commit 70dadb1916bfef8ba8cbc4e9b042cc8740f45e28) [MODERATION] Block adding collaborators - Ensure that the doer and blocked user cannot add each other as collaborators to repositories. - The Web UI gets an detailed message of the specific situation, the API gets an generic Forbidden code. - Unit tests has been added. - Integration testing for Web and API has been added. - This commit doesn't introduce removing each other as collaborators on the block action, due to the complexity of database calls that needs to be figured out. That deserves its own commit and test code. (cherry picked from commit 747be949a1b3cd06f6586512f1af4630e55d7ad4) [MODERATION] move locale_en-US.ini strings to avoid conflicts Conflicts: web_src/css/org.css web_src/css/user.css https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1180 (cherry picked from commit e53f955c888ebaafc863a6e463da87f70f5605da) Conflicts: services/issue/comments.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1212 (cherry picked from commit b4a454b576eee0c7738b2f7df1acaf5bf7810d12) Conflicts: models/forgejo_migrations/migrate.go options/locale/locale_en-US.ini services/pull/pull.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1264 [MODERATION] Remove blocked user collaborations with doer - When the doer blocks an user, who is also an collaborator on an repository that the doer owns, remove that collaboration. - Added unit tests. - Refactor the unit test to be more organized. (cherry picked from commit ec8701617830152680d69d50d64cb43cc2054a89) (cherry picked from commit 313e6174d832501c57724ae7a6285194b7b81aab) [MODERATION] QoL improvements (squash) - Ensure that organisations cannot be blocked. It currently has no effect, as all blocked operations cannot be executed from an organisation standpoint. - Refactored the API route to make use of the `UserAssignmentAPI` middleware. - Make more use of `t.Run` so that the test code is more clear about which block of code belongs to which test case. - Added more integration testing (to ensure the organisations cannot be blocked and some authorization/permission checks). (cherry picked from commit e9d638d0756ee20b6bf1eb999c988533a5066a68) [MODERATION] s/{{avatar/{{ctx.AvatarUtils.Avatar/ (cherry picked from commit ce8b30be1327ab98df2ba061dd7e2a278b278c5b) (cherry picked from commit f911dc402508b04cd5d5fb2f3332c2d640e4556e) Conflicts: options/locale/locale_en-US.ini https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1354 (cherry picked from commit c1b37b7fdaf06ee60da341dff76d703990c08082) (cherry picked from commit 856a2e09036adf56d987c6eee364c431bc37fb2e) [MODERATION] Show graceful error on comment creation - When someone is blocked by the repository owner or issue poster and try to comment on that issue, they get shown a graceful error. - Adds integration test. (cherry picked from commit 490646302e1e3dc3c59c9d75938b4647b6873ce7) (cherry picked from commit d3d88667cbb928a6ff80658eba8ef0c6c508c9e0) (cherry picked from commit 6818de13a921753e082b7c3d64c23917cc884e4b) [MODERATION] Show graceful error on comment creation (squash) typo (cherry picked from commit 1588d4834a37a744f092f2aeea6c9ef4795d7356) (cherry picked from commit d510ea52d091503e841d66f2f604348add8b4535) (cherry picked from commit 8249e93a14f628bb0e89fe3be678e4966539944e) [MODERATION] Refactor integration testing (squash) - Motivation for this PR is that I'd noticed that a lot of repeated calls are happening between the test functions and that certain tests weren't using helper functions like `GetCSRF`, therefor this refactor of the integration tests to keep it: clean, small and hopefully more maintainable and understandable. - There are now three integration tests: `TestBlockUser`, `TestBlockUserFromOrganization` and `TestBlockActions` (and has been moved in that order in the source code). - `TestBlockUser` is for doing blocking related actions as an user and `TestBlockUserFromOrganization` as an organisation, even though they execute the same kind of tests they do not share any database calls or logic and therefor it currently doesn't make sense to merge them together (hopefully such oppurtinutiy might be presented in the future). - `TestBlockActions` now contain all tests for actions that should be blocked after blocking has happened, most tests now share the same doer and blocked users and a extra fixture has been added to make this possible for the comment test. - Less code, more comments and more re-use between tests. (cherry picked from commit ffb393213d2f1269aad3c019d039cf60d0fe4b10) (cherry picked from commit 85505e0f815fede589c272d301c95204f9596985) (cherry picked from commit 0f3cf17761f6caedb17550f69de96990c2090af1) [MODERATION] Fix network error (squash) - Fix network error toast messages on user actions such as follow and unfollow. This happened because the javascript code now expects an JSON to be returned, but this wasn't the case due to cfa539e590127b4953b010fba3dea21c82a1714. - The integration testing has been adjusted to instead test for the returned flash cookie. (cherry picked from commit 112bc25e548d317a4ee00f9efa9068794a733e3b) (cherry picked from commit 1194fe4899eb39dcb9a2410032ad0cc67a62b92b) (cherry picked from commit 9abb95a8441e227874fe156095349a3173cc5a81) [MODERATION] Modernize frontend (squash) - Unify blocked users list. - Use the new flex list classes for blocked users list to avoid using the CSS helper classes and thereby be consistent in the design. - Fix the modal by using the new modal class. - Remove the icon in the modal as looks too big in the new design. - Fix avatar not displaying as it was passing the context where the user should've been passed. - Don't use italics for 'Blocked since' text. - Use namelink template to display the user's name and homelink. (cherry picked from commit ec935a16a319b14e819ead828d1d9875280d9259) (cherry picked from commit 67f37c83461aa393c53a799918e9708cb9b89b30) Conflicts: models/user/follow.go models/user/user_test.go routers/api/v1/user/follower.go routers/web/shared/user/header.go routers/web/user/profile.go templates/swagger/v1_json.tmpl https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1468 (cherry picked from commit 6a9626839c6342cd2767ea12757ee2f78eaf443b) Conflicts: tests/integration/api_nodeinfo_test.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1508#issuecomment-1242385 (cherry picked from commit 7378b251b481ed1e60e816caf8f649e8397ee5fc) Conflicts: models/fixtures/watch.yml models/issues/reaction.go models/issues/reaction_test.go routers/api/v1/repo/issue_reaction.go routers/web/repo/issue.go services/issue/issue.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1547 (cherry picked from commit c2028930c101223820de0bbafc318e9394c347b8) (cherry picked from commit d3f9134aeeef784586e8412e8dbba0a8fceb0cd4) (cherry picked from commit 7afe154c5c40bcc65accdf51c9224b2f7627a684) (cherry picked from commit 99ac7353eb1e834a77fe42aa89208791cc2364ff) (cherry picked from commit a9cde00c5c25ea8c427967cb7ab57abb618e44cb) Conflicts: services/user/delete.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1736
2023-08-15 01:07:38 +02:00
// Check if the user is not blocked by the repo's owner.
if user_model.IsBlocked(ctx, repo.OwnerID, issue.PosterID) {
return user_model.ErrBlockedByUser
}
if err := issues_model.NewIssue(ctx, repo, issue, labelIDs, uuids); err != nil {
return err
}
2019-10-28 17:45:43 +01:00
for _, assigneeID := range assigneeIDs {
if _, err := AddAssigneeIfNotAssigned(ctx, issue, issue.Poster, assigneeID, true); err != nil {
2019-10-28 17:45:43 +01:00
return err
}
}
mentions, err := issues_model.FindAndUpdateIssueMentions(ctx, issue, issue.Poster, issue.Content)
if err != nil {
return err
}
notify_service.NewIssue(ctx, issue, mentions)
if len(issue.Labels) > 0 {
notify_service.IssueChangeLabels(ctx, issue.Poster, issue, issue.Labels, nil)
}
if issue.Milestone != nil {
notify_service.IssueChangeMilestone(ctx, issue.Poster, issue, 0)
}
return nil
}
// ChangeTitle changes the title of this issue, as the given user.
func ChangeTitle(ctx context.Context, issue *issues_model.Issue, doer *user_model.User, title string) error {
oldTitle := issue.Title
issue.Title = title
if oldTitle == title {
return nil
}
if err := issues_model.ChangeIssueTitle(ctx, issue, doer, oldTitle); err != nil {
return err
}
if issue.IsPull && issues_model.HasWorkInProgressPrefix(oldTitle) && !issues_model.HasWorkInProgressPrefix(title) {
if err := issues_model.PullRequestCodeOwnersReview(ctx, issue, issue.PullRequest); err != nil {
return err
}
}
notify_service.IssueChangeTitle(ctx, doer, issue, oldTitle)
return nil
}
// ChangeIssueRef changes the branch of this issue, as the given user.
func ChangeIssueRef(ctx context.Context, issue *issues_model.Issue, doer *user_model.User, ref string) error {
oldRef := issue.Ref
issue.Ref = ref
if err := issues_model.ChangeIssueRef(ctx, issue, doer, oldRef); err != nil {
return err
}
notify_service.IssueChangeRef(ctx, doer, issue, oldRef)
return nil
}
// UpdateAssignees is a helper function to add or delete one or multiple issue assignee(s)
// Deleting is done the GitHub way (quote from their api documentation):
// https://developer.github.com/v3/issues/#edit-an-issue
// "assignees" (array): Logins for Users to assign to this issue.
// Pass one or more user logins to replace the set of assignees on this Issue.
// Send an empty array ([]) to clear all assignees from the Issue.
func UpdateAssignees(ctx context.Context, issue *issues_model.Issue, oneAssignee string, multipleAssignees []string, doer *user_model.User) (err error) {
var allNewAssignees []*user_model.User
// Keep the old assignee thingy for compatibility reasons
if oneAssignee != "" {
// Prevent double adding assignees
var isDouble bool
for _, assignee := range multipleAssignees {
if assignee == oneAssignee {
isDouble = true
break
}
}
if !isDouble {
multipleAssignees = append(multipleAssignees, oneAssignee)
}
}
// Loop through all assignees to add them
for _, assigneeName := range multipleAssignees {
assignee, err := user_model.GetUserByName(ctx, assigneeName)
if err != nil {
return err
}
allNewAssignees = append(allNewAssignees, assignee)
}
// Delete all old assignees not passed
if err = DeleteNotPassedAssignee(ctx, issue, doer, allNewAssignees); err != nil {
return err
}
// Add all new assignees
// Update the assignee. The function will check if the user exists, is already
// assigned (which he shouldn't as we deleted all assignees before) and
// has access to the repo.
for _, assignee := range allNewAssignees {
// Extra method to prevent double adding (which would result in removing)
_, err = AddAssigneeIfNotAssigned(ctx, issue, doer, assignee.ID, true)
if err != nil {
return err
}
}
return err
}
// DeleteIssue deletes an issue
func DeleteIssue(ctx context.Context, doer *user_model.User, gitRepo *git.Repository, issue *issues_model.Issue) error {
// load issue before deleting it
if err := issue.LoadAttributes(ctx); err != nil {
return err
}
if err := issue.LoadPullRequest(ctx); err != nil {
return err
}
// delete entries in database
if err := deleteIssue(ctx, issue); err != nil {
return err
}
// delete pull request related git data
if issue.IsPull && gitRepo != nil {
if err := gitRepo.RemoveReference(fmt.Sprintf("%s%d/head", git.PullPrefix, issue.PullRequest.Index)); err != nil {
return err
}
}
// If the Issue is pinned, we should unpin it before deletion to avoid problems with other pinned Issues
if issue.IsPinned() {
if err := issue.Unpin(ctx, doer); err != nil {
return err
}
}
notify_service.DeleteIssue(ctx, doer, issue)
return nil
}
// AddAssigneeIfNotAssigned adds an assignee only if he isn't already assigned to the issue.
// Also checks for access of assigned user
func AddAssigneeIfNotAssigned(ctx context.Context, issue *issues_model.Issue, doer *user_model.User, assigneeID int64, notify bool) (comment *issues_model.Comment, err error) {
assignee, err := user_model.GetUserByID(ctx, assigneeID)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
// Check if the user is already assigned
isAssigned, err := issues_model.IsUserAssignedToIssue(ctx, issue, assignee)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
if isAssigned {
// nothing to to
return nil, nil
}
valid, err := access_model.CanBeAssigned(ctx, assignee, issue.Repo, issue.IsPull)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
if !valid {
return nil, repo_model.ErrUserDoesNotHaveAccessToRepo{UserID: assigneeID, RepoName: issue.Repo.Name}
}
if notify {
_, comment, err = ToggleAssigneeWithNotify(ctx, issue, doer, assigneeID)
return comment, err
}
_, comment, err = issues_model.ToggleIssueAssignee(ctx, issue, doer, assigneeID)
return comment, err
}
// GetRefEndNamesAndURLs retrieves the ref end names (e.g. refs/heads/branch-name -> branch-name)
// and their respective URLs.
func GetRefEndNamesAndURLs(issues []*issues_model.Issue, repoLink string) (map[int64]string, map[int64]string) {
issueRefEndNames := make(map[int64]string, len(issues))
issueRefURLs := make(map[int64]string, len(issues))
for _, issue := range issues {
if issue.Ref != "" {
Use the type RefName for all the needed places and fix pull mirror sync bugs (#24634) This PR replaces all string refName as a type `git.RefName` to make the code more maintainable. Fix #15367 Replaces #23070 It also fixed a bug that tags are not sync because `git remote --prune origin` will not remove local tags if remote removed. We in fact should use `git fetch --prune --tags origin` but not `git remote update origin` to do the sync. Some answer from ChatGPT as ref. > If the git fetch --prune --tags command is not working as expected, there could be a few reasons why. Here are a few things to check: > >Make sure that you have the latest version of Git installed on your system. You can check the version by running git --version in your terminal. If you have an outdated version, try updating Git and see if that resolves the issue. > >Check that your Git repository is properly configured to track the remote repository's tags. You can check this by running git config --get-all remote.origin.fetch and verifying that it includes +refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*. If it does not, you can add it by running git config --add remote.origin.fetch "+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*". > >Verify that the tags you are trying to prune actually exist on the remote repository. You can do this by running git ls-remote --tags origin to list all the tags on the remote repository. > >Check if any local tags have been created that match the names of tags on the remote repository. If so, these local tags may be preventing the git fetch --prune --tags command from working properly. You can delete local tags using the git tag -d command. --------- Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-05-26 03:04:48 +02:00
issueRefEndNames[issue.ID] = git.RefName(issue.Ref).ShortName()
Prepend refs/heads/ to issue template refs (#20461) Fix #20456 At some point during the 1.17 cycle abbreviated refishs to issue branches started breaking. This is likely due serious inconsistencies in our management of refs throughout Gitea - which is a bug needing to be addressed in a different PR. (Likely more than one) We should try to use non-abbreviated `fullref`s as much as possible. That is where a user has inputted a abbreviated `refish` we should add `refs/heads/` if it is `branch` etc. I know people keep writing and merging PRs that remove prefixes from stored content but it is just wrong and it keeps causing problems like this. We should only remove the prefix at the time of presentation as the prefix is the only way of knowing umambiguously and permanently if the `ref` is referring to a `branch`, `tag` or `commit` / `SHA`. We need to make it so that every ref has the appropriate prefix, and probably also need to come up with some definitely unambiguous way of storing `SHA`s if they're used in a `ref` or `refish` field. We must not store a potentially ambiguous `refish` as a `ref`. (Especially when referring a `tag` - there is no reason why users cannot create a `branch` with the same short name as a `tag` and vice versa and any attempt to prevent this will fail. You can even create a `branch` and a `tag` that matches the `SHA` pattern.) To that end in order to fix this bug, when parsing issue templates check the provided `Ref` (here a `refish` because almost all users do not know or understand the subtly), if it does not start with `refs/` add the `BranchPrefix` to it. This allows people to make their templates refer to a `tag` but not to a `SHA` directly. (I don't think that is particularly unreasonable but if people disagree I can make the `refish` be checked to see if it matches the `SHA` pattern.) Next we need to handle the issue links that are already written. The links here are created with `git.RefURL` Here we see there is a bug introduced in #17551 whereby the provided `ref` argument can be double-escaped so we remove the incorrect external escape. (The escape added in #17551 is in the right place - unfortunately I missed that the calling function was doing the wrong thing.) Then within `RefURL()` we check if an unprefixed `ref` (therefore potentially a `refish`) matches the `SHA` pattern before assuming that is actually a `commit` - otherwise is assumed to be a `branch`. This will handle most of the problem cases excepting the very unusual cases where someone has deliberately written a `branch` to look like a `SHA1`. But please if something is called a `ref` or interpreted as a `ref` make it a full-ref before storing or using it. By all means if something is a `branch` assume the prefix is removed but always add it back in if you are using it as a `ref`. Stop storing abbreviated `branch` names and `tag` names - which are `refish` as a `ref`. It will keep on causing problems like this. Fix #20456 Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv> Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-11-22 13:58:49 +01:00
issueRefURLs[issue.ID] = git.RefURL(repoLink, issue.Ref)
}
}
return issueRefEndNames, issueRefURLs
}
// deleteIssue deletes the issue
func deleteIssue(ctx context.Context, issue *issues_model.Issue) error {
ctx, committer, err := db.TxContext(ctx)
if err != nil {
return err
}
defer committer.Close()
e := db.GetEngine(ctx)
if _, err := e.ID(issue.ID).NoAutoCondition().Delete(issue); err != nil {
return err
}
// update the total issue numbers
if err := repo_model.UpdateRepoIssueNumbers(ctx, issue.RepoID, issue.IsPull, false); err != nil {
return err
}
// if the issue is closed, update the closed issue numbers
if issue.IsClosed {
if err := repo_model.UpdateRepoIssueNumbers(ctx, issue.RepoID, issue.IsPull, true); err != nil {
return err
}
}
if err := issues_model.UpdateMilestoneCounters(ctx, issue.MilestoneID); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("error updating counters for milestone id %d: %w",
issue.MilestoneID, err)
}
if err := activities_model.DeleteIssueActions(ctx, issue.RepoID, issue.ID, issue.Index); err != nil {
return err
}
// find attachments related to this issue and remove them
if err := issue.LoadAttributes(ctx); err != nil {
return err
}
for i := range issue.Attachments {
system_model.RemoveStorageWithNotice(ctx, storage.Attachments, "Delete issue attachment", issue.Attachments[i].RelativePath())
}
// delete all database data still assigned to this issue
if err := db.DeleteBeans(ctx,
&issues_model.ContentHistory{IssueID: issue.ID},
&issues_model.Comment{IssueID: issue.ID},
&issues_model.IssueLabel{IssueID: issue.ID},
&issues_model.IssueDependency{IssueID: issue.ID},
&issues_model.IssueAssignees{IssueID: issue.ID},
&issues_model.IssueUser{IssueID: issue.ID},
&activities_model.Notification{IssueID: issue.ID},
&issues_model.Reaction{IssueID: issue.ID},
&issues_model.IssueWatch{IssueID: issue.ID},
&issues_model.Stopwatch{IssueID: issue.ID},
&issues_model.TrackedTime{IssueID: issue.ID},
&project_model.ProjectIssue{IssueID: issue.ID},
&repo_model.Attachment{IssueID: issue.ID},
&issues_model.PullRequest{IssueID: issue.ID},
&issues_model.Comment{RefIssueID: issue.ID},
&issues_model.IssueDependency{DependencyID: issue.ID},
&issues_model.Comment{DependentIssueID: issue.ID},
); err != nil {
return err
}
return committer.Commit()
}
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments This field adds the possibility to set the update date when modifying an issue through the API. A 'NoAutoDate' in-memory field is added in the Issue struct. If the update_at field is set, NoAutoDate is set to true and the Issue's UpdatedUnix field is filled. That information is passed down to the functions that actually updates the database, which have been modified to not auto update dates if requested. A guard is added to the 'EditIssue' API call, to checks that the udpate_at date is between the issue's creation date and the current date (to avoid 'malicious' changes). It also limits the new feature to project's owners and admins. (cherry picked from commit c524d33402c76bc4cccea2806f289e08a009baae) Add a SetIssueUpdateDate() function in services/issue.go That function is used by some API calls to set the NoAutoDate and UpdatedUnix fields of an Issue if an updated_at date is provided. (cherry picked from commit f061caa6555e0c9e922ee1e73dd2e4337360e9fe) Add an updated_at field to the API calls related to Issue's Labels. The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform about the modification of the issue's labels. (cherry picked from commit ea36cf80f58f0ab20c565a8f5d063b90fd741f97) Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's attachment creation The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform about the modification of the issue's content, and is set as the asset creation date. (cherry picked from commit 96150971ca31b97e97e84d5f5eb95a177cc44e2e) Checking Issue changes, with and without providing an updated_at date Those unit tests are added: - TestAPIEditIssueWithAutoDate - TestAPIEditIssueWithNoAutoDate - TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithAutoDate - TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithNoAutoDate - TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithAutoDate - TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithNoAutoDate (cherry picked from commit 4926a5d7a28581003545256632213bf4136b193d) Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment creation The update date is used as the comment creation date, and is applied to the issue as the update creation date. (cherry picked from commit 76c8faecdc6cba48ca4fe07d1a916d1f1a4b37b4) Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment edition The update date is used as the comment update date, and is applied to the issue as an update date. (cherry picked from commit cf787ad7fdb8e6273fdc35d7b5cc164b400207e9) Add an updated_at field to the API call for comment's attachment creation The update date is applied to the comment, and is set as the asset creation date. (cherry picked from commit 1e4ff424d39db7a4256cd9abf9c58b8d3e1b5c14) Checking Comment changes, with and without providing an updated_at date Those unit tests are added: - TestAPICreateCommentWithAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentWithNoAutoDate - TestAPIEditCommentWithAutoDate - TestAPIEditCommentWithNoAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithNoAutoDate (cherry picked from commit da932152f1deb3039a399516a51c8b6757059c91) Pettier code to set the update time of comments Now uses sess.AllCols().NoAutoToime().SetExpr("updated_unix", ...) XORM is smart enough to compose one single SQL UPDATE which all columns + updated_unix. (cherry picked from commit 1f6a42808dd739c0c2e49e6b7ae2967f120f43c2) Issue edition: Keep the max of the milestone and issue update dates. When editing an issue via the API, an updated_at date can be provided. If the EditIssue call changes the issue's milestone, the milestone's update date is to be changed accordingly, but only with a greater value. This ensures that a milestone's update date is the max of all issue's update dates. (cherry picked from commit 8f22ea182e6b49e933dc6534040160dd739ff18a) Rewrite the 'AutoDate' tests using subtests Also add a test to check the permissions to set a date, and a test to check update dates on milestones. The tests related to 'AutoDate' are: - TestAPIEditIssueAutoDate - TestAPIAddIssueLabelsAutoDate - TestAPIEditIssueMilestoneAutoDate - TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentAutoDate - TestAPIEditCommentWithDate - TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentAutoDate (cherry picked from commit 961fd13c551b3e50040acb7c914a00ead92de63f) (cherry picked from commit d52f4eea44692ee773010cb66a69a603663947d5) (cherry picked from commit 3540ea2a43155ca8cf5ab1a4a246babfb829db16) Conflicts: services/issue/issue.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1415 (cherry picked from commit 56720ade008c09122d825959171aa5346d645987) Conflicts: routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1462 (cherry picked from commit 47c78927d6c7e7a50298fa67efad1e73723a0981) (cherry picked from commit 2030f3b965cde401976821083c3250b404954ecc) (cherry picked from commit f02aeb76981cd688ceaf6613f142a8a725be1437) Conflicts: routers/api/v1/repo/issue_attachment.go routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment_attachment.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1575 (cherry picked from commit d072525b35e44faf7ff87143c0e52b8ba8a625c8) (cherry picked from commit 8424d0ab3df75ac3ffa30f42d398e22995ada5e7) (cherry picked from commit 5cc62caec788b54afd9da5b9193ce06ee8ec562b) (cherry picked from commit d6300d5dcd01c7ddc65d8b0f326f9c19cb53b58e) [FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) apply the 'update_at' value to the cross-ref comments (#1676) [this is a follow-up to PR #764] When a comment of issue A referencing issue B is added with a forced 'updated_at' date, that date has to be applied to the comment created in issue B. ----- Comment: While trying my 'RoundUp migration script', I found that this case was forgotten in PR #764 - my apologies... I'll try to write a functional test, base on models/issues/issue_xref_test.go Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1676 Co-authored-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org> Co-committed-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org> (cherry picked from commit ac4f727f63a2dd746dd84a31ebf7f70d5b5d7c52)
2023-10-09 19:07:47 +02:00
// Set the UpdatedUnix date and the NoAutoTime field of an Issue if a non
// nil 'updated' time is provided
//
// In order to set a specific update time, the DB will be updated with
// NoAutoTime(). A 'NoAutoTime' boolean field in the Issue struct is used to
// propagate down to the DB update calls the will to apply autoupdate or not.
func SetIssueUpdateDate(ctx context.Context, issue *issues_model.Issue, updated *time.Time, doer *user_model.User) error {
issue.NoAutoTime = false
if updated == nil {
return nil
}
if err := issue.LoadRepo(ctx); err != nil {
return err
}
// Check if the poster is allowed to set an update date
perm, err := access_model.GetUserRepoPermission(ctx, issue.Repo, doer)
if err != nil {
return err
}
if !perm.IsAdmin() && !perm.IsOwner() {
return fmt.Errorf("user needs to have admin or owner right")
}
// A simple guard against potential inconsistent calls
updatedUnix := timeutil.TimeStamp(updated.Unix())
if updatedUnix < issue.CreatedUnix || updatedUnix > timeutil.TimeStampNow() {
return fmt.Errorf("unallowed update date")
}
issue.UpdatedUnix = updatedUnix
issue.NoAutoTime = true
return nil
}