femsci/forgejo
femsci/forgejo
1
0
Fork 0
forked from NYANDEV/forgejo
Code Pull requests Activity
forgejo/models/fixtures/team_user.yml

126 lines
986 B
YAML
Raw Normal View History

Unit tests for models/access.go (#606)
2017-01-08 04:10:53 +01:00
-
id: 1
org_id: 3
team_id: 1
uid: 2
Unit tests and bug fix for models/org
2017-01-24 17:16:36 +01:00
-
id: 2
org_id: 3
team_id: 2
uid: 2
-
id: 3
org_id: 3
team_id: 2
uid: 4
-
id: 4
org_id: 6
team_id: 3
uid: 5
-
id: 5
org_id: 7
team_id: 4
uid: 5
Expand fixtures (#2571) * Add more repo search tests * Add and fix /api/repo/search integration tests * Add owner to access table for organization repositories * Remove tests
2017-09-22 12:51:16 +02:00
-
id: 6
org_id: 17
team_id: 5
Fix repository search function (#2689) * Fix and remove FIXME * Respect membership visibility * Fix/rewrite searchRepositoryByName function * Add unit tests * Add integration tests * Remove Searcher completely * Remove trailing space
2017-10-17 17:20:22 +02:00
uid: 15
-
id: 7
org_id: 17
team_id: 5
Add search mode option to /api/repo/search (#2756) * Add repo type option to /api/repo/search * Add tests and fix result of collaborative filter in specific condition * Fix/optimize search & tests * Improve integration tests * Fix lint errors * Fix unit tests * Change and improve internal implementation of repo search * Use NonexistentID * Make search api more general * Change mirror and fork search behaviour * Fix tests & typo in comment
2017-10-26 23:16:13 +02:00
uid: 18
-
id: 8
org_id: 19
team_id: 6
Restrict permission check on repositories and fix some problems (#5314) * fix units permission problems * fix some bugs and merge LoadUnits to repoAssignment * refactor permission struct and add some copyright heads * remove unused codes * fix routes units check * improve permission check * add unit tests for permission * fix typo * fix tests * fix some routes * fix api permission check * improve permission check * fix some permission check * fix tests * fix tests * improve some permission check * fix some permission check * refactor AccessLevel * fix bug * fix tests * fix tests * fix tests * fix AccessLevel * rename CanAccess * fix tests * fix comment * fix bug * add missing unit for test repos * fix bug * rename some functions * fix routes check
2018-11-28 12:26:14 +01:00
uid: 20
-
id: 9
org_id: 3
team_id: 7
uid: 15
-
id: 10
org_id: 17
team_id: 8
uid: 2
-
id: 11
org_id: 17
team_id: 9
org/members: display 2FA members states + optimize sql requests (#7621) * org/members: display 2FA state * fix comment typo * lay down UserList bases * add basic test for previous methods * add comment for UserList type * add valid two-fa account * test new UserList methods * optimize MembersIsPublic by side loading info on GetMembers + fix integrations tests * respect fmt rules * use map for data * Optimize GetTwoFaStatus * rewrite by using existing sub func * Optimize IsUserOrgOwner * remove un-used code * tests: cover empty org + fix import order * tests: add ErrTeamNotExist path * tests: fix wrong expected result
2019-08-02 18:06:28 +02:00
uid: 20
-
id: 12
org_id: 25
team_id: 10
uid: 24
Team permission to create repository in organization (#8312) * Add team permission setting to allow creating repo in organization. Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com> * Add test case for creating repo when have team creation access. Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com> * build error: should omit comparison to bool constant Signed-off-by: David Svantesson <davidsvantesson@gmail.com> * Add comment on exported functions * Fix fixture consistency, fix existing unit tests * Fix boolean comparison in xorm query. * addCollaborator and changeCollaborationAccessMode separate steps More clear to use different if-cases. * Create and commit xorm session * fix * Add information of create repo permission in team sidebar * Add migration step * Clarify that repository creator will be administrator. * Fix some things after merge * Fix language text that use html * migrations file * Create repository permission -> Create repositories * fix merge * fix review comments
2019-11-20 12:27:49 +01:00
-
id: 13
org_id: 3
team_id: 12
uid: 28
-
id: 14
org_id: 6
team_id: 13
uid: 28
Restricted users (#6274) * Restricted users (#4334): initial implementation * Add User.IsRestricted & UI to edit it * Pass user object instead of user id to places where IsRestricted flag matters * Restricted users: maintain access rows for all referenced repos (incl public) * Take logged in user & IsRestricted flag into account in org/repo listings, searches and accesses * Add basic repo access tests for restricted users Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se> * Mention restricted users in the faq Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se> * Revert unnecessary change `.isUserPartOfOrg` -> `.IsUserPartOfOrg` Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se> * Remove unnecessary `org.IsOrganization()` call Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se> * Revert to an `int64` keyed `accessMap` * Add type `userAccess` * Add convenience func updateUserAccess() * Turn accessMap into a `map[int64]userAccess` Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se> * or even better: `map[int64]*userAccess` * updateUserAccess(): use tighter syntax as suggested by lafriks * even tighter * Avoid extra loop * Don't disclose limited orgs to unauthenticated users * Don't assume block only applies to orgs * Use an array of `VisibleType` for filtering * fix yet another thinko * Ok - no need for u * Revert "Ok - no need for u" This reverts commit 5c3e886aabd5acd997a3b35687d322439732c200. Co-authored-by: Antoine GIRARD <sapk@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2020-01-13 18:33:46 +01:00
-
id: 15
org_id: 17
team_id: 9
uid: 29
Fix user visible check (#21210) Fixes #21206 If user and viewer are equal the method should return true. Also the common organization check was wrong as `count` can never be less then 0. Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-09-20 09:59:20 +02:00
-
id: 16
org_id: 19
team_id: 6
uid: 31
Don't return duplicated users who can create org repo (#22560) - Currently the function `GetUsersWhoCanCreateOrgRepo` uses a query that is able to have duplicated users in the result, this is can happen under the condition that a user is in team that either is the owner team or has permission to create organization repositories. - Add test code to simulate the above condition for user 3, [`TestGetUsersWhoCanCreateOrgRepo`](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/a1fcb1cfb84fd6b36c8fe9fd56588119fa4377bc/models/organization/org_test.go#L435) is the test function that tests for this. - The fix is quite trivial use a map keyed by user id in order to drop duplicates. --------- Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-01-30 11:12:45 +01:00
-
id: 17
org_id: 3
team_id: 14
uid: 2
Improve permission check of packages (#23879) At first, we have one unified team unit permission which is called `Team.Authorize` in DB. But since https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/17811, we allowed different units to have different permission. The old code is only designed for the old version. So after #17811, if org users have write permission of other units, but have no permission of packages, they can also get write permission of packages. Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-04-06 16:18:29 +02:00
-
id: 18
org_id: 23
team_id: 17
uid: 5
Revert package access change from #23879 (#25707) (#25785) Backport #25707 by @KN4CK3R Fixes (?) #25538 Fixes https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/972 Regression #23879 #23879 introduced a change which prevents read access to packages if a user is not a member of an organization. That PR also contained a change which disallows package access if the team unit is configured with "no access" for packages. I don't think this change makes sense (at the moment). It may be relevant for private orgs. But for public or limited orgs that's useless because an unauthorized user would have more access rights than the team member. This PR restores the old behaviour "If a user has read access for an owner, they can read packages". Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
2023-07-09 23:00:42 +02:00
-
id: 19
org_id: 35
team_id: 18
uid: 1
-
id: 20
org_id: 36
team_id: 19
uid: 1
-
id: 21
org_id: 36
team_id: 20
uid: 5
Copy permalink