- If a repository is forked to a private or limited user/organization,
the fork should not be visible in the list of forks depending on the
doer requesting the list of forks.
- Added integration testing for web and API route.
(cherry picked from commit 061abe6004)
- Add a permission check that the doer has write permissions to the head
repository if the the 'delete branch after merge' is enabled when
merging a pull request.
- Unify the checks in the web and API router to `DeleteBranchAfterMerge`.
- Added integration tests.
(cherry picked from commit 266e0b2ce9)
Conflicts:
tests/integration/pull_merge_test.go
trivial context conflict
- The Conan and Container packages use a different type of
authentication. It first authenticates via the regular way (api tokens
or user:password, handled via `auth.Basic`) and then generates a JWT
token that is used by the package software (such as Docker) to do the
action they wanted to do. This JWT token didn't properly propagate the
API scopes that the token was generated for, and thus could lead to a
'scope escalation' within the Conan and Container packages, read
access to write access.
- Store the API scope in the JWT token, so it can be propagated on
subsequent calls that uses that JWT token.
- Integration test added.
- Resolves#5128
(cherry picked from commit 5a871f6095)
The PATCH if issue & pull request switched to use the service
functions instead. However, the service function changing the state is
not idempotent. Instead of doing nothing which changing from open to
open or close to close, it will fail with an error like:
Issue [2472] 0 was already closed
Regression of: 6a4bc0289d
Fixes: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/4686
(cherry picked from commit e9e3b8c0f3)
The `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/comments/{id}` API endpoint returns an
`assets` field, but the route handler did not load attachments, thus,
the field was never populated.
This patch fixes that, and adds a test to exercise it. The test fails
without the fix.
This addresses a bug discovered in Codeberg/Community#1607.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit fc4f914e71)
- The param wasn't `sha`, it was `ref`. Use this instead.
- Adds new integration tests.
- Resolves#4190
- Resolves#4025
(cherry picked from commit a8460bb132)
- Make the `UserSettings` definition an non-array, this is consistent
with the existing endpoints that uses this definition.
- Resolves#4179
(cherry picked from commit 5926ed1f73)
Backport #31188
Fixes issue when running `choco info pkgname` where `pkgname` is also a
substring of another package Id.
Relates to #31168
---
This might fix the issue linked, but I'd like to test it with more choco
commands before closing the issue in case I find other problems if
that's ok.
I'm pretty inexperienced with Go, so feel free to nitpick things.
Not sure I handled
[this](70f87e11b5/routers/api/packages/nuget/nuget.go (L135-L137))
in the best way, so looking for feedback on if I should fix the
underlying issue (`nil` might be a better default for `Value`?).
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
(cherry picked from commit ca414a7ccf5e26272662e360c44ac50221a0f2d4)
This allows `nix flake metadata` and nix in general to lock a *branch*
tarball link in a manner that causes it to fetch the correct commit even
if the branch is updated with a newer version.
For further context, Nix flakes are a feature that, among other things,
allows for "inputs" that are "github:someuser/somerepo",
"https://some-tarball-service/some-tarball.tar.gz",
"sourcehut:~meow/nya" or similar. This feature allows our users to fetch
tarballs of git-based inputs to their builds rather than using git to
fetch them, saving significant download time.
There is presently no gitea or forgejo specific fetcher in Nix, and we
don't particularly wish to have one. Ideally (as a developer on a Nix
implementation myself) we could just use the generic tarball fetcher and
not add specific forgejo support, but to do so, we need additional
metadata to know which commit a given *branch* tarball represents, which
is the purpose of the Link header added here.
The result of this patch is that a Nix user can specify `inputs.something.url =
"https://forgejo-host/some/project/archive/main.tar.gz"` in flake.nix
and get a link to some concrete tarball for the actual commit in the
lock file, then when they run `nix flake update` in the future, they
will get the latest commit in that branch.
Example of it working locally:
» nix flake metadata --refresh 'http://localhost:3000/api/v1/repos/jade/cats/archive/main.tar.gz?dir=configs/nix'
Resolved URL: http://localhost:3000/api/v1/repos/jade/cats/archive/main.tar.gz?dir=configs/nix
Locked URL: 804ede182b.tar.gz?dir=configs
/nix&narHash=sha256-yP7KkDVfuixZzs0fsqhSETXFC0y8m6nmPLw2GrAMxKQ%3D
Description: Computers with the nixos
Path: /nix/store/s856c6yqghyan4v0zy6jj19ksv0q22nx-source
Revision: 804ede182b6b66469b23ea4d21eece52766b7a06
Last modified: 2024-05-02 00:48:32
For details on the header value, see:
56763ff918/doc/manual/src/protocols/tarball-fetcher.md
(cherry picked from commit 6631f56ebf)
Fix#30921
(cherry picked from commit 821d2fc2a3cc897f21d707455850177077b72410)
(cherry picked from commit 50b4e7f26e)
Equivalent to the Gitea v1.22 commit
(cherry picked from commit 8eac16de217978c1f7034f8e360f54d8d638e95e)
Before explaining the fix itself, lets look at the `action` table, and
how it is populated. Data is only ever inserted into it via
`activities_model.NotifyWatchers`, which will:
- Insert a row for each activity with `UserID` set to the acting user's
ID - this is the original activity, and is always inserted if anything
is to be inserted at all.
- It will insert a copy of each activity with the `UserID` set to the
repo's owner, if the owner is an Organization, and isn't the acting
user.
- It will insert a copy of each activity for every watcher of the repo,
as long as the watcher in question has read permission to the repo
unit the activity is about.
This means that if a repository belongs to an organizations, for most
activities, it will have at least two rows in the table. For
repositories watched by people other than their owner, an additional row
for each watcher.
These are useful duplicates, because they record which activities are
relevant for a particular user. However, for cases where we wish to see
the activities that happen around a repository, without limiting the
results to a particular user, we're *not* interested in the duplicates
stored for the watchers and the org. We only need the originals.
And this is what this change does: it introduces an additional option to
`GetFeedsOptions`: `OnlyPerformedByActor`. When this option is set,
`activities.GetFeeds()` will only return the original activities, where
the user id and the acting user id are the same. As these are *always*
inserted, we're not missing out on any activities. We're just getting
rid of the duplicates. As this is an additional `AND` condition, it can
never introduce items that would not have been included in the result
set before, it can only reduce, not extend.
These duplicates were only affecting call sites where `RequestedRepo`
was set, but `RequestedUser` and `RequestedTeam` were not. Both of those
call sites were updated to set `OnlyPerformedByActor`. As a result,
repository RSS feeds, and the `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/activities/feeds`
API end points no longer return dupes, only the original activities.
Rather than hardcoding this behaviour into `GetFeeds()` itself, I chose
to implement it as an explicit option, for the sake of clarity.
FixesCodeberg/Community#684, and addresses gitea#20986.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit 9cb2aa989a)
Fix#30807
reuse functions in services
(cherry picked from commit a50026e2f30897904704895362da0fb12c7e5b26)
Conflicts:
models/issues/issue_update.go
routers/api/v1/repo/issue.go
trivial context conflict because of 'allow setting the update date on issues and comments'
(cherry picked from commit 6a4bc0289d)
We should be listing all repositories by default.
Fixes#28483.
(cherry picked from commit 9f0ef3621a3b63ccbe93f302a446b67dc54ad725)
Conflict:
- if ctx.IsSigned && ctx.Doer.IsAdmin || permission.UnitAccessMode(unit_model.TypeCode) >= perm.AccessModeRead {
+ if ctx.IsSigned && ctx.Doer.IsAdmin || permission.HasAccess() {
because of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2001
(cherry picked from commit e388822e9d)
Before, we would just throw 500 if a user passes an attachment that is
not an allowed type. This commit catches this error and throws a 422
instead since this should be considered a validation error.
(cherry picked from commit 872caa17c0a30d95f85ab75c068d606e07bd10b3)
Conflicts:
tests/integration/api_comment_attachment_test.go
tests/integration/api_issue_attachment_test.go
trivial context conflict because of 'allow setting the update date on issues and comments'
(cherry picked from commit 9cd0441cd3)
Backport #30291 by @edwardzhanged
Add some logic in `convert.ToBranchProtection` to return only the names
associated with readAccess instead of returning all names. This will
ensure consistency in behavior between the frontend and backend.
Fixes: #27694
Co-authored-by: Edward Zhang <45360012+edwardzhanged@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.com>
Co-authored-by: wenzhuo.zhang <wenzhuo.zhang@geely.com>
(cherry picked from commit d88958bb99eabc07dead6965e396755e7b6d947f)
Backport #30511 by @yp05327
Fix#30508
ps: if `sourceID` is not set, `LoginName` will be ignored
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
(cherry picked from commit f9a025f6a358aa6e34408743a59f5081f397d47c)
Fix#30378
(cherry picked from commit 0fe9f93eb4c94d55e43b18b9c3cc6d513a34c0b5)
Conflicts:
- models/organization/org.go
- services/repository/delete.go
- services/user/delete.go
In all three cases, conflicts were resolved by manually adding
the lines added by the Gitea patch, keeping the Forgejo code
surrounding them.
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1518
An attempt at adding an optional pronoun field for user profiles, as suggested here 3 years ago: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/13990
I made this for [my own instance](https://git.gay/h) and didn't initially think I'd make a PR because of the previous closed issue, but I thought I'd ask the Forgejo matrix chat to see if there was any support and there was!
I'm told I should make a database migration, some help as to how to do that would be appreciated.
Co-authored-by: hazycora <hazysu@riseup.net>
Co-authored-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3076
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
- Currently protected branch rules do not apply to admins, however in
some cases (like in the case of Forgejo project) you might also want to
apply these rules to admins to avoid accidental merges.
- Add new option to configure this on a per-rule basis.
- Adds integration tests.
- Resolves#65
Resolves#29965.
---
Manually tested this by:
- Following the
[installation](https://docs.gitea.com/next/installation/install-with-docker#basics)
guide (but built a local Docker image instead)
- Creating 2 users, one who is the `Owner` of a newly-created repository
and the other a `Collaborator`
- Had the `Collaborator` create a PR that the `Owner` reviews
- `Collaborator` resolves conversation and `Owner` merges PR
And with this change we see that we can no longer see re-request review
button for the `Owner`:
<img width="1351" alt="Screenshot 2024-03-25 at 12 39 18 AM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/60799661/bcd9c579-3cf7-474f-a51e-b436fe1a39a4">
(cherry picked from commit 242b331260925e604150346e61329097d5731e77)
Now, the chars `=:;()[]{}~!@#$%^ &` are possible as well
Fixes#30134
---------
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
(cherry picked from commit 1ad48f781eb0681561b083b49dfeff84ba51f2fe)
This PR will avoid load pullrequest.Issue twice in pull request list
page. It will reduce x times database queries for those WIP pull
requests.
Partially fix#29585
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
(cherry picked from commit 62f8174aa2fae1481c7e17a6afcb731a5b178cd0)
Conflicts:
models/activities/notification_list.go
moved to models/activities/notification.go
In #28691, schedule plans will be deleted when a repo's actions unit is
disabled. But when the unit is enabled, the schedule plans won't be
created again.
This PR fixes the bug. The schedule plans will be created again when the
actions unit is re-enabled
(cherry picked from commit adc3598a75)
Fix#28157
This PR fix the possible bugs about actions schedule.
- Move `UpdateRepositoryUnit` and `SetRepoDefaultBranch` from models to
service layer
- Remove schedules plan from database and cancel waiting & running
schedules tasks in this repository when actions unit has been disabled
or global disabled.
- Remove schedules plan from database and cancel waiting & running
schedules tasks in this repository when default branch changed.
(cherry picked from commit 97292da960)
Conflicts:
modules/actions/github.go
routers/web/repo/setting/default_branch.go
routers/web/repo/setting/setting.go
services/repository/branch.go
services/repository/setting.go
tests/integration/actions_trigger_test.go
Repositories displaying an "Add more..." tab on the header is a neat way
to let people discover they can enable more units. However, displaying
it all the time for repository owners, even when they deliberately do
not want to enable more units gets noisy very fast.
As such, this patch introduces a new setting which lets people disable
this hint under the appearance settings.
Fixes#2378.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Fix#20175
Current implementation of API does not allow creating pull requests
between branches of the same
repo when you specify *namespace* (owner of the repo) in `head` field in
http request body.
---
Although GitHub implementation of API allows performing such action and
since Gitea targeting
compatibility with GitHub API I see it as an appropriate change.
I'm proposing a fix to the described problem and test case which covers
this logic.
My use-case just in case:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/20175#issuecomment-1711283022
(cherry picked from commit ed02d1fab85c9b8206c0af84dcfc3792e61609cf)
Add the same auth check and middlewares as the /v1/ API.
It require to export some variable from /v1 API, i am not sure if is the correct way to do
Co-authored-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2582
Reviewed-by: oliverpool <oliverpool@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Ada <ada@gnous.eu>
Co-committed-by: Ada <ada@gnous.eu>
(cherry picked from commit 25b842df261452a29570ba89ffc3a4842d73f68c)
Conflicts:
routers/web/repo/wiki.go
services/repository/branch.go
services/repository/migrate.go
services/wiki/wiki.go
also apply to Forgejo specific usage of the refactored functions
