Commit graph

4318 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Gusted
63736e8301
[FEAT] Add support for webauthn credential level 3
- For WebAuthn Credential level 3, the `backup_eligible` and
`backup_state` flags are checked if they are consistent with the values
given on login. Forgejo never stored this data, so add a database
migration that makes all webauthn credentials 'legacy' and on the next
first use capture the values of `backup_eligible` and `backup_state`.
As suggested in https://github.com/go-webauthn/webauthn/discussions/219#discussioncomment-10429662
- Adds unit tests.
- Add E2E test.
2024-08-29 10:05:03 +02:00
Earl Warren
9addaedaf3 Merge pull request '[gitea] week 2024-35 cherry pick (gitea/main -> forgejo)' (#5109) from algernon/wcp/2024-35 into forgejo
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/5109
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
2024-08-27 06:09:19 +00:00
Gergely Nagy
3b70949651
feat: Trivial default quota configuration
This adds a new configuration setting: `[quota.default].TOTAL`, which
will be used if no groups are configured for a particular user. The new
option makes it possible to entirely skip configuring quotas via the API
if all that one wants is a total size.

Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
2024-08-26 13:25:34 +02:00
Lunny Xiao
dda53569b1
Fix agit automerge (#31207)
(cherry picked from commit 8b92eba21f5c5cca277b8101ada0ea7a1fb32ae0)
2024-08-25 10:47:37 +02:00
Philip Peterson
03508b33a8
[FEAT] Allow pushmirror to use publickey authentication
- Continuation of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/18835 (by
@Gusted, so it's fine to change copyright holder to Forgejo).
- Add the option to use SSH for push mirrors, this would allow for the
deploy keys feature to be used and not require tokens to be used which
cannot be limited to a specific repository. The private key is stored
encrypted (via the `keying` module) on the database and NEVER given to
the user, to avoid accidental exposure and misuse.
- CAVEAT: This does require the `ssh` binary to be present, which may
not be available in containerized environments, this could be solved by
adding a SSH client into forgejo itself and use the forgejo binary as
SSH command, but should be done in another PR.
- CAVEAT: Mirroring of LFS content is not supported, this would require
the previous stated problem to be solved due to LFS authentication (an
attempt was made at forgejo/forgejo#2544).
- Integration test added.
- Resolves #4416
2024-08-22 17:05:07 +02:00
Earl Warren
c76a73ad35 Merge pull request '[gitea] week 2024-34 cherry pick (gitea/main -> forgejo)' (#4998) from earl-warren/wcp/2024-34 into forgejo
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4998
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
2024-08-20 06:32:09 +00:00
Earl Warren
7e37c4d831 Merge pull request '[BUG] Don't fire notification for comment of pending review' (#4487) from gusted/webhook-issue into forgejo
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4487
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
2024-08-19 09:04:50 +00:00
Earl Warren
51620ab0f3 Merge pull request 'Update module github.com/golangci/golangci-lint/cmd/golangci-lint to v1.60.1 (forgejo)' (#4953) from renovate/forgejo-github.com-golangci-golangci-lint-cmd-golangci-lint-1.x into forgejo
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4953
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
2024-08-19 07:38:14 +00:00
Gusted
15c64122a6
[BUG] Don't fire notification for comment of pending review
- When a comment was updated or deleted and was part of an
pending/ongoing review, it would have triggered a notification, such as
a webhook.
- This patch checks if the comment is part of a pending review and then
does not fire a notification and, in the case of updating a comment,
does not save the content history because this is not necessary if it is
still a "draft" comment given it is a pending comment (there is no need
to see my embarrassing typos).
- Adds integration tests.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/4368
2024-08-18 17:04:00 +02:00
Gusted
fe18428806
Fix linting issues 2024-08-18 16:25:13 +02:00
TheFox0x7
8322882265
style: reenable switch check 2024-08-18 15:19:01 +02:00
Lunny Xiao
d5500422c9
Fix panic of ssh public key page after deletion of auth source (#31829)
Fix #31730

This PR rewrote the function `PublicKeysAreExternallyManaged` with a
simple test. The new function removed the loop to make it more readable.

(cherry picked from commit b491b2104f83ee8fc4956c099c427b339291b3be)
2024-08-18 06:28:26 +02:00
Jason Song
7f1db1df3e
Show lock owner instead of repo owner on LFS setting page (#31788)
Fix #31784.

Before:

<img width="1648" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/03f32545-4a85-42ed-bafc-2b193a5d8023">

After:

<img width="1653" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e5bcaf93-49cb-421f-aac1-5122bc488b02">

(cherry picked from commit 0470646d46f90c20f40fde718be6ef8d8c84ee2c)
2024-08-18 05:47:06 +02:00
Jason Song
a627b885c7
Support compression for Actions logs (#31761)
Support compression for Actions logs to save storage space and
bandwidth. Inspired by
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/24256#issuecomment-1521153015

The biggest challenge is that the compression format should support
[seekable](https://github.com/facebook/zstd/blob/dev/contrib/seekable_format/zstd_seekable_compression_format.md).
So when users are viewing a part of the log lines, Gitea doesn't need to
download the whole compressed file and decompress it.

That means gzip cannot help here. And I did research, there aren't too
many choices, like bgzip and xz, but I think zstd is the most popular
one. It has an implementation in Golang with
[zstd](https://github.com/klauspost/compress/tree/master/zstd) and
[zstd-seekable-format-go](https://github.com/SaveTheRbtz/zstd-seekable-format-go),
and what is better is that it has good compatibility: a seekable format
zstd file can be read by a regular zstd reader.

This PR introduces a new package `zstd` to combine and wrap the two
packages, to provide a unified and easy-to-use API.

And a new setting `LOG_COMPRESSION` is added to the config, although I
don't see any reason why not to use compression, I think's it's a good
idea to keep the default with `none` to be consistent with old versions.

`LOG_COMPRESSION` takes effect for only new log files, it adds `.zst` as
an extension to the file name, so Gitea can determine if it needs
decompression according to the file name when reading. Old files will
keep the format since it's not worth converting them, as they will be
cleared after #31735.

<img width="541" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e9598764-a4e0-4b68-8c2b-f769265183c9">

(cherry picked from commit 33cc5837a655ad544b936d4d040ca36d74092588)

Conflicts:
	assets/go-licenses.json
	go.mod
	go.sum
  resolved with make tidy
2024-08-13 06:51:49 +02:00
Edip Emre Bodur
8b6747173a
Fix null requested_reviewer from API (#31773)
If the assign the pull request review to a team, it did not show the
members of the team in the "requested_reviewers" field, so the field was
null. As a solution, I added the team members to the array.

fix #31764

(cherry picked from commit 94cca8846e7d62c8a295d70c8199d706dfa60e5c)
2024-08-13 06:51:49 +02:00
Yaroslav Halchenko
5ae2dbcb14 Adjust codespell config + make it fix few typos which sneaked in since addition of codespell support (#4857)
Now that my colleague just posted a wonderful blog post https://blog.datalad.org/posts/forgejo-runner-podman-deployment/ on forgejo runner, some time I will try to add that damn codespell action to work on CI here ;)  meanwhile some typos managed to sneak in and this PR should address them (one change might be functional in a test -- not sure if would cause a fail or not)

### Release notes

- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4857
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
Co-committed-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
2024-08-08 16:07:35 +00:00
Earl Warren
517637137c Merge pull request '[gitea] week 2024-32 cherry pick (gitea/main -> forgejo)' (#4801) from earl-warren/wcp/2024-32 into forgejo
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4801
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
2024-08-06 05:47:20 +00:00
Gusted
eb8c125788
[CHORE] Remove SSH DSA tests
- Partially resolves #4659
- Fixes CI.
2024-08-05 20:34:19 +02:00
Gergely Nagy
f121e87aa6
activitypub: Implement an instance-wide actor
An instance-wide actor is required for outgoing signed requests that are
done on behalf of the instance, rather than on behalf of other actors.
Such things include updating profile information, or fetching public
keys.

Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
2024-08-05 10:50:26 +02:00
Lunny Xiao
46f9fc2bc6
Rename head branch of pull requests when renaming a branch (#31759)
Fix #31716

(cherry picked from commit 572aaebd96b43bc576fe32187be82f689e855464)
2024-08-04 18:24:10 +02:00
Kemal Zebari
1aaa70fddb
Remove unused code from models/repos/release.go (#31756)
These blocks aren't used anywhere else when doing a grep search.

(cherry picked from commit 0e3d8f80486be11ff53bdd9030a8b32d4f477d19)
2024-08-04 18:24:10 +02:00
Jason Song
0c40cff9a4
Clear up old Actions logs (#31735)
Part of #24256.

Clear up old action logs to free up storage space.

Users will see a message indicating that the log has been cleared if
they view old tasks.

<img width="1361" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9f0f3a3a-bc5a-402f-90ca-49282d196c22">

Docs: https://gitea.com/gitea/docs/pulls/40

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
(cherry picked from commit 687c1182482ad9443a5911c068b317a91c91d586)

Conflicts:
	custom/conf/app.example.ini
	routers/web/repo/actions/view.go
  trivial context conflict
2024-08-04 18:24:10 +02:00
Denys Konovalov
5734499778
add skip secondary authorization option for public oauth2 clients (#31454) (migration v301)
(cherry picked from commit a8d0c879c38e21a8e78db627119bf622d919ee75)
2024-08-04 18:24:10 +02:00
Henry Goodman
ee8f3e09f8
Allow force push to protected branches (#28086) (migration v300)
Fixes #22722

Currently, it is not possible to force push to a branch with branch
protection rules in place. There are often times where this is necessary
(CI workflows/administrative tasks etc).

The current workaround is to rename/remove the branch protection,
perform the force push, and then reinstate the protections.

Provide an additional section in the branch protection rules to allow
users to specify which users with push access can also force push to the
branch. The default value of the rule will be set to `Disabled`, and the
UI is intuitive and very similar to the `Push` section.

It is worth noting in this implementation that allowing force push does
not override regular push access, and both will need to be enabled for a
user to force push.

This applies to manual force push to a remote, and also in Gitea UI
updating a PR by rebase (which requires force push)

This modifies the `BranchProtection` API structs to add:
- `enable_force_push bool`
- `enable_force_push_whitelist bool`
- `force_push_whitelist_usernames string[]`
- `force_push_whitelist_teams string[]`
- `force_push_whitelist_deploy_keys bool`

<img width="943" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/7491899c-d816-45d5-be84-8512abd156bf">

branch `test` being a protected branch:

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/e018e6e9-b7b2-4bd3-808e-4947d7da35cc)
<img width="1038" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/79623665/57ead13e-9006-459f-b83c-7079e6f4c654">

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 12cb1d2998f2a307713ce979f8d585711e92061c)
2024-08-04 18:24:10 +02:00
Jason Song
3fdaabcdcf
Use UTC as default timezone when schedule Actions cron tasks (#31742)
Fix #31657.

According to the
[doc](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions#onschedule)
of GitHub Actions, The timezone for cron should be UTC, not the local
timezone. And Gitea Actions doesn't have any reasons to change this, so
I think it's a bug.

However, Gitea Actions has extended the syntax, as it supports
descriptors like `@weekly` and `@every 5m`, and supports specifying the
timezone like `TZ=UTC 0 10 * * *`. So we can make it use UTC only when
the timezone is not specified, to be compatible with GitHub Actions, and
also respect the user's specified.

It does break the feature because the times to run tasks would be
changed, and it may confuse users. So I don't think we should backport
this.

## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️

If the server's local time zone is not UTC, a scheduled task would run
at a different time after upgrading Gitea to this version.

(cherry picked from commit 21a73ae642b15982a911837775c9583deb47220c)
2024-08-04 18:24:10 +02:00
Jason Song
6844258c67
Clarify Actions resources ownership (#31724)
Fix #31707.

Also related to #31715.

Some Actions resources could has different types of ownership. It could
be:

- global: all repos and orgs/users can use it.
- org/user level: only the org/user can use it.
- repo level: only the repo can use it.

There are two ways to distinguish org/user level from repo level:
1. `{owner_id: 1, repo_id: 2}` for repo level, and `{owner_id: 1,
repo_id: 0}` for org level.
2. `{owner_id: 0, repo_id: 2}` for repo level, and `{owner_id: 1,
repo_id: 0}` for org level.

The first way seems more reasonable, but it may not be true. The point
is that although a resource, like a runner, belongs to a repo (it can be
used by the repo), the runner doesn't belong to the repo's org (other
repos in the same org cannot use the runner). So, the second method
makes more sense.

And the first way is not user-friendly to query, we must set the repo id
to zero to avoid wrong results.

So, #31715 should be right. And the most simple way to fix #31707 is
just:

```diff
-	shared.GetRegistrationToken(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository.OwnerID, ctx.Repo.Repository.ID)
+	shared.GetRegistrationToken(ctx, 0, ctx.Repo.Repository.ID)
```

However, it is quite intuitive to set both owner id and repo id since
the repo belongs to the owner. So I prefer to be compatible with it. If
we get both owner id and repo id not zero when creating or finding, it's
very clear that the caller want one with repo level, but set owner id
accidentally. So it's OK to accept it but fix the owner id to zero.

(cherry picked from commit a33e74d40d356e8f628ac06a131cb203a3609dec)
2024-08-04 18:24:10 +02:00
yp05327
c784a58740
Fix the display of project type for deleted projects (#31732)
Fix: #31727
After:

![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1dfb4b31-3bd6-47f7-b126-650f33f453e2)

(cherry picked from commit 75d0b61546e00390afdd850149de525dd64336a5)

Conflicts:
	options/locale/locale_en-US.ini
  trivial conflict & fix excessive uppercase to unify with the other translations
2024-08-04 10:14:34 +02:00
yp05327
49eb831663
Fix Null Pointer error for CommitStatusesHideActionsURL (#31731)
Fix https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/30156#discussion_r1695247028

Forgot fixing it in #31719

(cherry picked from commit 0a11bce87f07233d5f02554b8f3b4a2aabd37769)
2024-08-04 10:14:34 +02:00
yp05327
2be49a3745
Fix loadRepository error when access user dashboard (#31719)
(cherry picked from commit 7b388630ecb4537f9bb04e55cbb10eb7cf83b9c5)
2024-08-04 10:14:34 +02:00
Lunny Xiao
7850fa30a5
Make GetRepositoryByName more safer (#31712)
Fix #31708

(cherry picked from commit d109923ed8e58bce0ad26b47385edbc79403803d)
2024-08-04 10:14:34 +02:00
Earl Warren
c8e5e39865
Hide the "Details" link of commit status when the user cannot access actions (testifylint) 2024-08-04 08:54:32 +02:00
Zettat123
0dbc623028
Hide the "Details" link of commit status when the user cannot access actions (#30156)
Fix #26685

If a commit status comes from Gitea Actions and the user cannot access
the repo's actions unit (the user does not have the permission or the
actions unit is disabled), a 404 page will occur after clicking the
"Details" link. We should hide the "Details" link in this case.

<img
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/15528715/68361714-b784-4bb5-baab-efde4221f466"
width="400px" />

(cherry picked from commit 7dec8de9147b20c014d68bb1020afe28a263b95a)

Conflicts:
	routers/web/repo/commit.go
  trivial context commit
2024-08-04 08:47:07 +02:00
Exploding Dragon
f17194ca91 Arch packages implementation (#4785)
This PR is from https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/31037

This PR was originally created by @d1nch8g , and the original source code comes from https://ion.lc/core/gitea.

This PR adds a package registry for [Arch Linux](https://archlinux.org/) packages with support for package files, [signatures](https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Pacman/Package_signing), and automatic [pacman-database](https://archlinux.org/pacman/repo-add.8.html) management.

Features:

1. Push any ` tar.zst ` package and Gitea sign it.
2. Delete endpoint for specific package version and all related files
3. Supports trust levels with `SigLevel = Required`.
4. Package UI with instructions to connect to the new pacman database and visualised package metadata

![](/attachments/810ca6df-bd20-44c2-bdf7-95e94886d750)

You can follow [this tutorial](https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Creating_packages) to build a *.pkg.tar.zst package for testing

docs pr: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/791

Co-authored-by: d1nch8g@ion.lc
Co-authored-by: @KN4CK3R
Co-authored-by: @mahlzahn
Co-authored-by: @silverwind
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4785
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Exploding Dragon <explodingfkl@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: Exploding Dragon <explodingfkl@gmail.com>
2024-08-04 06:16:29 +00:00
Gergely Nagy
e1fe3bbdc0
feat(quota): Humble beginnings of a quota engine
This is an implementation of a quota engine, and the API routes to
manage its settings. This does *not* contain any enforcement code: this
is just the bedrock, the engine itself.

The goal of the engine is to be flexible and future proof: to be nimble
enough to build on it further, without having to rewrite large parts of
it.

It might feel a little more complicated than necessary, because the goal
was to be able to support scenarios only very few Forgejo instances
need, scenarios the vast majority of mostly smaller instances simply do
not care about. The goal is to support both big and small, and for that,
we need a solid, flexible foundation.

There are thee big parts to the engine: counting quota use, setting
limits, and evaluating whether the usage is within the limits. Sounds
simple on paper, less so in practice!

Quota counting
==============

Quota is counted based on repo ownership, whenever possible, because
repo owners are in ultimate control over the resources they use: they
can delete repos, attachments, everything, even if they don't *own*
those themselves. They can clean up, and will always have the permission
and access required to do so. Would we count quota based on the owning
user, that could lead to situations where a user is unable to free up
space, because they uploaded a big attachment to a repo that has been
taken private since. It's both more fair, and much safer to count quota
against repo owners.

This means that if user A uploads an attachment to an issue opened
against organization O, that will count towards the quota of
organization O, rather than user A.

One's quota usage stats can be queried using the `/user/quota` API
endpoint. To figure out what's eating into it, the
`/user/repos?order_by=size`, `/user/quota/attachments`,
`/user/quota/artifacts`, and `/user/quota/packages` endpoints should be
consulted. There's also `/user/quota/check?subject=<...>` to check
whether the signed-in user is within a particular quota limit.

Quotas are counted based on sizes stored in the database.

Setting quota limits
====================

There are different "subjects" one can limit usage for. At this time,
only size-based limits are implemented, which are:

- `size:all`: As the name would imply, the total size of everything
  Forgejo tracks.
- `size:repos:all`: The total size of all repositories (not including
  LFS).
- `size:repos:public`: The total size of all public repositories (not
  including LFS).
- `size:repos:private`: The total size of all private repositories (not
  including LFS).
- `size:git:all`: The total size of all git data (including all
  repositories, and LFS).
- `size:git:lfs`: The size of all git LFS data (either in private or
  public repos).
- `size:assets:all`: The size of all assets tracked by Forgejo.
- `size:assets:attachments:all`: The size of all kinds of attachments
  tracked by Forgejo.
- `size:assets:attachments:issues`: Size of all attachments attached to
  issues, including issue comments.
- `size:assets:attachments:releases`: Size of all attachments attached
  to releases. This does *not* include automatically generated archives.
- `size:assets:artifacts`: Size of all Action artifacts.
- `size:assets:packages:all`: Size of all Packages.
- `size:wiki`: Wiki size

Wiki size is currently not tracked, and the engine will always deem it
within quota.

These subjects are built into Rules, which set a limit on *all* subjects
within a rule. Thus, we can create a rule that says: "1Gb limit on all
release assets, all packages, and git LFS, combined". For a rule to
stand, the total sum of all subjects must be below the rule's limit.

Rules are in turn collected into groups. A group is just a name, and a
list of rules. For a group to stand, all of its rules must stand. Thus,
if we have a group with two rules, one that sets a combined 1Gb limit on
release assets, all packages, and git LFS, and another rule that sets a
256Mb limit on packages, if the user has 512Mb of packages, the group
will not stand, because the second rule deems it over quota. Similarly,
if the user has only 128Mb of packages, but 900Mb of release assets, the
group will not stand, because the combined size of packages and release
assets is over the 1Gb limit of the first rule.

Groups themselves are collected into Group Lists. A group list stands
when *any* of the groups within stand. This allows an administrator to
set conservative defaults, but then place select users into additional
groups that increase some aspect of their limits.

To top it off, it is possible to set the default quota groups a user
belongs to in `app.ini`. If there's no explicit assignment, the engine
will use the default groups. This makes it possible to avoid having to
assign each and every user a list of quota groups, and only those need
to be explicitly assigned who need a different set of groups than the
defaults.

If a user has any quota groups assigned to them, the default list will
not be considered for them.

The management APIs
===================

This commit contains the engine itself, its unit tests, and the quota
management APIs. It does not contain any enforcement.

The APIs are documented in-code, and in the swagger docs, and the
integration tests can serve as an example on how to use them.

Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
2024-08-02 11:10:34 +02:00
Robert Wolff
994bd93e69 feat(UI): add package counter to repo/user/org overview pages
- add package counter to repo/user/org overview pages
    - add go unit tests for repo/user has/count packages
    - add many more unit tests for packages model
    - fix error for non-existing packages in DeletePackageByID and SetRepositoryLink
2024-07-31 12:40:24 +02:00
TheFox0x7
4de909747b Add testifylint to lint checks (#4535)
go-require lint is ignored for now

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4535
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: TheFox0x7 <thefox0x7@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: TheFox0x7 <thefox0x7@gmail.com>
2024-07-30 19:41:10 +00:00
Earl Warren
94933470cd Merge pull request 'Implement external release assets' (#1445) from maltejur/forgejo:forgejo-external-attachments into forgejo
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1445
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
2024-07-30 15:50:57 +00:00
Earl Warren
d40873e768 Merge pull request '[gitea] week 2024-31 cherry pick (gitea/main -> forgejo)' (#4716) from earl-warren/wcp/2024-31 into forgejo
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4716
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
2024-07-30 15:45:27 +00:00
Earl Warren
7b798a88ee Merge pull request 'fix(UI): issue task list numbers, fix #4431' (#4452) from mahlzahn/forgejo:fix_issue_task_list_numbers_issue_4431 into forgejo
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4452
Reviewed-by: Beowulf <beowulf@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
2024-07-29 20:50:42 +00:00
Malte Jürgens
a61e7c7a39
Implement external assets 2024-07-29 20:35:55 +02:00
Earl Warren
e6786db393
fix: never set Poster or Assignee to nil
When a user is not found for whatever reason, it must be mapped to the
GhostUser.

Fixes: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/4718
2024-07-29 15:24:02 +02:00
Robert Wolff
b2bbf48c18 simplify regex for checkbox detection 2024-07-28 14:18:34 +00:00
Robert Wolff
9f461e180a remove requirement on trailing character after check box 2024-07-28 14:18:34 +00:00
Robert Wolff
b222c48060 fix counting of all / done issue tasks, fix #4431 2024-07-28 14:18:34 +00:00
yp05327
d0e52fd641
Support delete user email in admin panel (#31690)
![QQ_1721784609320](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/23f08bf3-93f4-44d7-963d-10380ef8c1f1)

![QQ_1721784616403](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/667cbd1e-5e21-4489-8d18-2a7be85190db)

![QQ_1721784626722](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/495beb94-dfa2-481c-aa60-d5115cad1ae1)

---------

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
(cherry picked from commit cc044818c33ff066c4e5869c9e75de9707def6ed)
2024-07-28 09:00:29 +02:00
Gusted
4c40bf5d29 Merge pull request '[SEC] Notify owner about TOTP enrollment' (#4704) from gusted/sec-more-totp into forgejo
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4704
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
2024-07-27 20:53:47 +00:00
Earl Warren
ff6aceaeac
feat: optimize the FindUnreferencedPackages package query
Replace a double select with a simple select.

The complication originates from the initial implementation which
deleted packages instead of selecting them. It was justified to
workaround a problem in MySQL. But it is just a waste of resources
when collecting a list of IDs.
2024-07-27 15:57:24 +02:00
Gusted
a7e96aae66
[SEC] Notify owner about TOTP enrollment
- In the spirit of #4635
- Notify the owner when their account is getting enrolled into TOTP. The
message is changed according if they have security keys or not.
- Integration test added.
2024-07-26 19:49:22 +02:00
Gusted
4383da91bd
[SECURITY] Notify users about account security changes
- Currently if the password, primary mail, TOTP or security keys are
changed, no notification is made of that and makes compromising an
account a bit easier as it's essentially undetectable until the original
person tries to log in. Although other changes should be made as
well (re-authing before allowing a password change), this should go a
long way of improving the account security in Forgejo.
- Adds a mail notification for password and primary mail changes. For
the primary mail change, a mail notification is sent to the old primary
mail.
- Add a mail notification when TOTP or a security keys is removed, if no
other 2FA method is configured the mail will also contain that 2FA is
no longer needed to log into their account.
- `MakeEmailAddressPrimary` is refactored to the user service package,
as it now involves calling the mailer service.
- Unit tests added.
- Integration tests added.
2024-07-23 18:31:47 +02:00
Earl Warren
ded237ee77 Merge pull request '[gitea] week 2024-30 cherry pick (gitea/main -> forgejo)' (#4607) from algernon/wcp/2024-30 into forgejo
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4607
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
2024-07-23 16:01:28 +00:00