- Currently protected branch rules do not apply to admins, however in
some cases (like in the case of Forgejo project) you might also want to
apply these rules to admins to avoid accidental merges.
- Add new option to configure this on a per-rule basis.
- Adds integration tests.
- Resolves#65
They are bound to change. The worst that can happen is that the same
error happens somewhere else and is ignored although it should
not. Which is not worse than the previous situation which was to
ignore all errors anyway.
Also be more liberal about what is ignored. Some error messages are
very long and may contain elements with some variance. It is enough to
have an ignored that is specific.
(cherry picked from commit a60b34a451)
This is, in large part, a refactoring: we rename `CommitVerification` to
`ObjectVerification`, and adjust `ParseObjectWithSignature` (previously
`ParseCommitWithSignature`) to work on an object, rather than a commit.
This in turn, lets us implement `ParseTagWithSignature` on top of it, so
commit & tag signature verification will share most of the code.
Work sponsored by @glts.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
This makes signed tags show a badge in the tag list similar to signed
commits in the commit list, and a more verbose block when viewing a
single tag. Works for both GPG and SSH signed tags.
Fixes#1316.
Work sponsored by @glts.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2906
Following #2763 (refactor of git check-attr)
and #2866 (wrong log.Error format in check-attr)
- refactors the `nul-byte` reader to be used in both the streaming and one-off cases.
- add test for some failure cases
- don't log the error returned by `cmd.Run`, but return it to the `CheckPath` caller (which can then decide what to do with it).
This should solve the following flaky `log.Error` (or at least move it to the caller, instead of being inside a random goroutine):
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/actions/runs/9541/jobs/5#jobstep-7-839
> FATAL ERROR: log.Error has been called: 2024/03/28 14:30:33 ...it/repo_attribute.go:313:func2() [E] Unable to open checker for 3fa2f829675543ecfc16b2891aebe8bf0608a8f4. Error: failed to run attr-check. Error: exit status 128
Stderr: fatal: this operation must be run in a work tree
Co-authored-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2939
Reviewed-by: oliverpool <oliverpool@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
- The dropdowns that contain filters for issues and pull requests are
currently not styled with the `small` class, which causes a smaller font
size to be set. Remove it for the `Sort` filter to make it consistent
and make it _more_ readable.
- Resolves#2914
Existing Forgejo packages may rely on setting GITEA_VERSION to specify
the version to build if:
* they do not build from the git repository with the proper tag
* they build from a source tarbal that does not have a VERSION file
With 7.0 the logic of setting the version was modified in the
`[RELEASE] Gitea version is for interoperability only` commit and
ignores this variable which creates an unecessary breaking change.
If GITEA_VERSION is set, the versions will be set on 7.0 exactly as
they would have with version before and included 1.21.
* If GITEA_VERSION is not set, all versions are the same
* If GITEA_VERSION is set, there is a distinction between the version
set in the binary are returned by the Gitea API and the
version returned by the Forgejo API which includes metadata.
Before:
$ make GITEA_VERSION=7.0.0 show-version-full
7.0.0-dev-1809-cd6fa771ab+gitea-1.22.0
$ make GITEA_VERSION=7.0.0 show-version-api
7.0.0-dev-1809-cd6fa771ab+gitea-1.22.0
After:
$ make GITEA_VERSION=7.0.0 show-version-full
7.0.0
$ make GITEA_VERSION=7.0.0 show-version-api
7.0.0+gitea-1.22.0
- Colordots are generated for colors in inline code, such as `red`,
`rgb(255, 0, 124)`, `#ffaabb` and `hsl(124, 52%, 50%)`. However this
shouldn't be doon for literal color names as these can be too common
assiocated with non-color related stuff _and matches the behavior of
some other forge_.
- Move the regexes from bluemonday to Forgejo and do the checking
ourselves.
- Adds unit tests.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/1510
- Currently emojis that are part of the label's name aren't rendered
when shown in the popup that you get when you hover over issue
references.
- This patch fixes that by rendering the emoji.
- Adds CSS to not make the emoji big in the label.
- Resolves#1531
The intention was good initially but the expression was wrong for two
reasons:
* When a pull_request event is received for a labeled action, the
match should be github.event.action == 'label_updated' and not
'labeled'
* The event does not have a github.event.label field and
contains(github.event.label.name, 'backport/v') will always be
false.
Since the expression is only evaluated in the context of a merged pull
request, either because it was just closed or because it was labeled
after the fact, the only verification that is needed is to assert that
there is at least one `backport/v*` label.
