Backport #28205 by @CodeShakingSheep
In the [docs for email
setup](https://docs.gitea.com/administration/email-setup)
`mailer.IS_TLS_ENABLED` is mentioned which was replaced by
`mailer.PROTOCOL` in release 1.18.0 according to
https://blog.gitea.com/release-of-1.18.0/ . This change wasn't reflected
in the docs for email setup. I just replaced the deprecated mailer
setting.
Co-authored-by: CodeShakingSheep <19874562+CodeShakingSheep@users.noreply.github.com>
Backport #28191 by @yp05327
https://gitea.com/gitea/gitea-docusaurus/actions/runs/661/jobs/0#jobstep-9-39
I noticed that there are many warning logs in building docs.
It is causing 404 in docs.gitea.com now, so we need to fix it.
And there are also some other problems in v1.19 which can not be done in
this PR.
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
Backport #28200
gitea doctor failed at checking and fixing 'delete-orphaned-repos',
because table name 'user' needs quoting to be correctly recognized by at
least PostgreSQL.
fixes#28199
Backport #28184Fix#25473
Although there was `m.Post("/login/oauth/access_token", CorsHandler()...`,
it never really worked, because it still lacks the "OPTIONS" handler.
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #28160 by @yp05327
Since #27054, Actions are enabled by default. so we should also edit the
document. 😃
ps: I think this should be backport to 1.21.0.
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
Backport #28143 by @wxiaoguang
Compare by ignoring spaces:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/28143/files?diff=split&w=1
When the form is going to be submitted, add the "is-loading" class to
show an indicator and avoid user UI events.
When the request finishes (success / error), remove the "is-loading"
class to make user can interact the UI.
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #27610 by @evantobin
Fixes#27598
In #27080, the logic for the tokens endpoints were updated to allow
admins to create and view tokens in other accounts. However, the same
functionality was not added to the DELETE endpoint. This PR makes the
DELETE endpoint function the same as the other token endpoints and adds
unit tests
Co-authored-by: Evan Tobin <me@evantob.in>
Backport #28072
To avoid unnecessary database access, the `cacheTime` should always be
set if the revision has been checked.
Fix#28057
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport changelog for v1.21.0 as Giteabot doesn't seem to be in the
mood for it
---------
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Backport #28014 by @earl-warren
System users (Ghost, ActionsUser, etc) have a negative id and may be the
author of a comment, either because it was created by a now deleted user
or via an action using a transient token.
The GetPossibleUserByID function has special cases related to system
users and will not fail if given a negative id.
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1425
(cherry picked from commit 6a2d2fa243)
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <109468362+earl-warren@users.noreply.github.com>
Backport #28019 by @anudeepreddy
Hi,
This PR fixes#27988. The use of `path.join`(which uses `/` as the file
separator) to construct paths and comparing them with paths constructed
using `filepath.join`(which uses platform specific file separator) is
the root cause of this issue.
The desired behavior is to ignore attachments when dumping data
directory. Due to the what's mentioned above, the function
`addRecursiveExclude` is not actually ignoring the attachments directory
and is being written to the archive. The attachment directory is again
added to the archive (with different file separator as mentioned in the
issue) causing a duplicate entry on windows.
The solution is to use `filepath.join` in `addResursiveExclude` to
construct `currentAbsPath`.
Co-authored-by: Anudeep Reddy <anudeepc85@gmail.com>
Backport #27946 by @lng2020
As title. Some attachments and file sizes can easily be larger than
these limits
Co-authored-by: Nanguan Lin <70063547+lng2020@users.noreply.github.com>
Backport #27994 by @wxiaoguang
To improve maintainability, this PR:
1. Rename `web_src/js/modules/aria` to `web_src/js/modules/fomantic`
(the code there are all for aria of fomantic)
2. Move api/transition related code to
`web_src/js/modules/fomantic/api.js` and
`web_src/js/modules/fomantic/transition.js`
No logic is changed.
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #27927 by @invliD
When an assignee changed event comment is rendered, most of it is
guarded behind the assignee ID not being 0. However, if it is 0, that
results in quite broken rendering for that comment and the next one.
This can happen, for example, when repository data imported from outside
of Gitea is incomplete.
This PR makes sure comments with an assignee ID of 0 are not rendered at
all.
---
Screenshot before:
<img width="272" alt="Bildschirmfoto 2023-11-05 um 20 12 18"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/42910/7d629d76-fee4-4fe5-9e3a-bf524050cead">
The comments in this screenshot are:
1. A regular text comment
2. A user being unassigned
3. A user being assigned
4. The title of the PR being changed
Comments 2 and 3 are rendered without any text, which indents the next
comment and does not leave enough vertical space.
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Brückner <code@nik.dev>
Backport #27915 by @KN4CK3R
Fixes#27819
We have support for two factor logins with the normal web login and with
basic auth. For basic auth the two factor check was implemented at three
different places and you need to know that this check is necessary. This
PR moves the check into the basic auth itself.
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Backport #27930 by @lng2020
The bug has been fixed for several months in the
`docker/build-push-action`
The fix commit is
[d8823bfaed](d8823bfaed)
as the Gitea Actions Doc mentioned too.
Co-authored-by: Nanguan Lin <70063547+lng2020@users.noreply.github.com>
Backport #27912 by @delvh
This should be the easiest fix.
While other solutions might be possible that exterminate the root cause,
they will not be as trivial.
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
